Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Eswatini
48.05 million current US$
in 2021
Puerto Rico
56.91 million current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
166th
Puerto Rico rank
164th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019952021

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 56.91 million current US$ against 48.05 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 8.86 million current US$.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 166th and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1990s 8.83 million current US$ 13.75 million current US$ 4.91 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2000s 14.88 million current US$ 51.88 million current US$ 37.00 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2010s 27.39 million current US$ 99.42 million current US$ 72.02 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2020s 44.42 million current US$ 53.91 million current US$ 9.49 million current US$ Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 56.91 million current US$ against 48.05 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
8.86 million current US$, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Eswatini ranks 166th and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.