Barbados vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Barbados
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 48.05 million current US$ against 44.13 million current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 3.92 million current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 168th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.66 million current US$ | 8.83 million current US$ | 7.83 million current US$ | Barbados |
| 2000s | 41.76 million current US$ | 14.88 million current US$ | 26.88 million current US$ | Barbados |
| 2010s | 48.62 million current US$ | 27.39 million current US$ | 21.22 million current US$ | Barbados |
| 2020s | 43.83 million current US$ | 44.42 million current US$ | 594,050 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Barbados or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 48.05 million current US$ against 44.13 million current US$ in Barbados as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Barbados and Eswatini?
- 3.92 million current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Barbados ranks 168th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.