How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP

Argentina

0.0155 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2021

Namibia

0.0147 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2021

Argentina rank

84th

Namibia rank

87th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Argentina
Namibia

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.0155 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0147 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 207 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.007 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0069 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2000s	0.0155 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0095 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.006 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2010s	0.0115 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.011 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2020s	0.016 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0151 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per unit of gdp, Argentina or Namibia?: Argentina, at 0.0155 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0147 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per unit of gdp between Argentina and Namibia?: 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per unit of gdp?: Argentina ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 207 places, 6,553 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.