Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.4% against 2.1% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Lithuania ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 89th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -10.0% | -2.1% | 7.8% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 4.6% | 3.5% | 1.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 1.4% | 4.8% | 3.4% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.4% against 2.1% in Lithuania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.3%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 89th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.