Bosnia and Herzegovina vs OECD members: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- OECD members
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 10.5% against 4.7% in OECD members, a difference of 5.8%.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 2.2 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 22nd of 154 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.2% | 0.4% | 4.8% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 1.6% | 1.7% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 4.3% | -0.4% | 4.7% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or OECD members?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 10.5% against 4.7% in OECD members as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and OECD members?
- 5.8%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and OECD members?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and OECD members rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 22nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.