Belize vs Late-demographic dividend: Adjusted net national income per capita
Adjusted net national income per capita over time
- Belize
- Late-demographic dividend
How they compare
Belize currently reports 12.1% against 5.5% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 6.6%.
That makes Belize's figure about 2.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.
Belize ranks 16th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 154 countries.
Late-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Late-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.0% | 4.7% | 6.7% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 2000s | -1.5% | 7.1% | 8.5% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 4.5% | 3.7% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 2020s | -0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | Late-demographic dividend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net national income per capita, Belize or Late-demographic dividend?
- Belize, at 12.1% against 5.5% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net national income per capita between Belize and Late-demographic dividend?
- 6.6%, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Late-demographic dividend?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Belize and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for adjusted net national income per capita?
- Belize ranks 16th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.