Least developed countries vs Poland: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Least developed countries
54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Poland
1.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Least developed countries rank
35th
Poland rank
32nd

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Poland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199520082021

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 30.1 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 35th and Poland ranks 32nd of 36 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 27,462 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 924,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 896,938 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 40,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.26 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 54,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Poland?
Poland, at 1.65 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Poland?
1.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Poland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Least developed countries and Poland rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 35th and Poland ranks 32nd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Poland: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/poland/">Least developed countries vs Poland: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.