China vs Least developed countries: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

China
1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Least developed countries
54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
China rank
38th
Least developed countries rank
35th

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Least developed countries
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M199520082021

How they compare

China currently reports 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 1.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 21.6 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 38th and Least developed countries ranks 35th of 150 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 407,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,462 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 380,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 858,073 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 817,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 1.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, China or Least developed countries?
China, at 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between China and Least developed countries?
1.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Least developed countries?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do China and Least developed countries rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 38th and Least developed countries ranks 35th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Least developed countries: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">China vs Least developed countries: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.