Chile vs Tunisia: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Tunisia
255,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile rank
80th
Tunisia rank
82nd

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019952021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 255,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 18,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 82nd of 150 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 41,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,627 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,189 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 46,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,282 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 91,443 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79,005 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 154,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 127,099 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,911 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 255,561 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 233,595 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,966 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 265,512 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 249,976 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,536 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Tunisia?
Chile, at 273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 255,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Tunisia?
18,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tunisia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and Tunisia rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 82nd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tunisia: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/tunisia/">Chile vs Tunisia: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.