Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
303,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile rank
80th
Ecuador rank
77th

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019952021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 303,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 30,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 80th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 150 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 41,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 100,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,004 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 46,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,752 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 91,443 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 166,323 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 154,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 186,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 255,561 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 293,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 265,512 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 301,813 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,301 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 303,686 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 273,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Ecuador?
30,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 80th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.