Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
3,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania
8,316 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
150th
Mauritania rank
147th

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mauritania
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k198020002021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 8,316 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 5,273 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 2.7 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 150 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 3,968 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 516.18 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 2,966 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 3,052 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 8,316 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
5,273 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/">Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.