Botswana vs Congo: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
21,113 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo
13,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
138th
Congo rank
141st

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019952021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 21,113 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 7,735 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.6 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 138th and Congo ranks 141st of 150 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 1,402 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,093 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 3,019 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 7,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,946 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 10,217 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,015 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 18,189 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,179 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 20,783 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,619 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 21,113 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Congo?
7,735 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for adjusted net national income (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 138th and Congo ranks 141st of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-net-national-income-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,274 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.