Paraguay vs Polynesia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of

Paraguay
100 %
in 2025
Polynesia
40 %
in 2010
Paraguay rank
1st
Polynesia rank
2nd

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Paraguay
  • Polynesia
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 100 % against 40 % in Polynesia, a difference of 60 %.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 2.5 times Polynesia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Paraguay ranks 1st and Polynesia ranks 2nd of 130 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 100 % 57 % 43 % Paraguay
2010s 100 % 40 % 60 % Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of, Paraguay or Polynesia?
Paraguay, at 100 % against 40 % in Polynesia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of between Paraguay and Polynesia?
60 %, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Polynesia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2010.
How do Paraguay and Polynesia rank globally for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Paraguay ranks 1st and Polynesia ranks 2nd of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Polynesia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/paraguay/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/paraguay/polynesia/">Paraguay vs Polynesia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.