There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence was 1 Score in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1 Score
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 173 countries
All-time high
1 Score
in 2005
All-time low
0 Score
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023
There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in Score.
Analysis
The most recent figure for there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 1 Score, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 1 Score in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 Score, in 2000.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st of 173 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 Score | — |
| 2001 | 0 Score | — |
| 2002 | 0 Score | — |
| 2003 | 0 Score | — |
| 2004 | 0 Score | — |
| 2005 | 1 Score | — |
| 2006 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 Score | +0.0% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with similar countries
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 1 Score is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1 Score, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 1 Score is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1 Score, 1.0× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 Score | 0 Score | 1 Score | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 Score | 1 Score | 1 Score | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 Score | 1 Score | 1 Score | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 1 Albania 1 Score compare
- 1 Algeria 1 Score compare
- 1 Angola 1 Score compare
- 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 Score compare
- 1 Argentina 1 Score compare
- 1 Armenia 1 Score compare
- 1 Australia 1 Score compare
- 1 Austria 1 Score compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 1 Score compare
- 1 Bahamas 1 Score compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 Score compare
- 1 Bangladesh 1 Score compare
- 1 Barbados 1 Score compare
- 1 Belarus 1 Score compare
- 1 Belgium 1 Score compare
- 1 Belize 1 Score compare
- 1 Benin 1 Score compare
- 1 Bhutan 1 Score compare
- 1 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 1 Score compare
- 1 Botswana 1 Score compare
- 1 Brazil 1 Score compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 1 Score compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 Score compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 1 Score compare
- 1 Burundi 1 Score compare
- 1 Cabo Verde 1 Score compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 Score compare
- 1 Canada 1 Score compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 Score compare
- 1 Chad 1 Score compare
- 1 Chile 1 Score compare
- 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 1 Score compare
- 1 China, mainland 1 Score compare
- 1 Colombia 1 Score compare
- 1 Comoros 1 Score compare
- 1 Congo 1 Score compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 Score compare
- 1 Côte d'Ivoire 1 Score compare
- 1 Croatia 1 Score compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 Score compare
- 1 Czechia 1 Score compare
- 1 Denmark 1 Score compare
- 1 Djibouti 1 Score compare
- 1 Dominica 1 Score compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 1 Score compare
- 1 Ecuador 1 Score compare
- 1 Egypt 1 Score compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 Score compare
- 1 Eswatini 1 Score compare
- 1 Ethiopia 1 Score compare
- 1 Fiji 1 Score compare
- 1 Finland 1 Score compare
- 1 France 1 Score compare
- 1 Gabon 1 Score compare
- 1 Gambia 1 Score compare
- 1 Georgia 1 Score compare
- 1 Germany 1 Score compare
- 1 Ghana 1 Score compare
- 1 Greece 1 Score compare
- 1 Grenada 1 Score compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 Score compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 Score compare
- 1 Guyana 1 Score compare
- 1 Honduras 1 Score compare
- 1 Hungary 1 Score compare
- 1 Iceland 1 Score compare
- 1 India 1 Score compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 Score compare
- 1 Ireland 1 Score compare
- 1 Israel 1 Score compare
- 1 Italy 1 Score compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 Score compare
- 1 Japan 1 Score compare
- 1 Jordan 1 Score compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 Score compare
- 1 Kenya 1 Score compare
- 1 Kiribati 1 Score compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 Score compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 Score compare
- 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1 Score compare
- 1 Latvia 1 Score compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 Score compare
- 1 Lesotho 1 Score compare
- 1 Liberia 1 Score compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 Score compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 Score compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 Score compare
- 1 Malawi 1 Score compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 Score compare
- 1 Maldives 1 Score compare
- 1 Malta 1 Score compare
- 1 Marshall Islands 1 Score compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 Score compare
- 1 Mexico 1 Score compare
- 1 Micronesia (Federated States of) 1 Score compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 Score compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 Score compare
- 1 Morocco 1 Score compare
- 1 Mozambique 1 Score compare
- 1 Namibia 1 Score compare
- 1 Nepal 1 Score compare
- 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 1 Score compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 Score compare
- 1 Nicaragua 1 Score compare
- 1 Nigeria 1 Score compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 Score compare
- 1 Norway 1 Score compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 Score compare
- 1 Palau 1 Score compare
- 1 Panama 1 Score compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 1 Score compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 Score compare
- 1 Peru 1 Score compare
- 1 Philippines 1 Score compare
- 1 Poland 1 Score compare
- 1 Portugal 1 Score compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 1 Score compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 1 Score compare
- 1 Republic of Moldova 1 Score compare
- 1 Romania 1 Score compare
- 1 Rwanda 1 Score compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 Score compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 1 Score compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 Score compare
- 1 Samoa 1 Score compare
- 1 San Marino 1 Score compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 Score compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 1 Score compare
- 1 Senegal 1 Score compare
- 1 Serbia 1 Score compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 Score compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 1 Score compare
- 1 Singapore 1 Score compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 Score compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 Score compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 1 Score compare
- 1 South Africa 1 Score compare
- 1 Spain 1 Score compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 Score compare
- 1 Suriname 1 Score compare
- 1 Sweden 1 Score compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 Score compare
- 1 Tajikistan 1 Score compare
- 1 Thailand 1 Score compare
- 1 Timor-Leste 1 Score compare
- 1 Togo 1 Score compare
- 1 Tonga 1 Score compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 Score compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 Score compare
- 1 Türkiye 1 Score compare
- 1 Uganda 1 Score compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 Score compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 1 Score compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 Score compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 Score compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 Score compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 Score compare
- 1 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1 Score compare
- 1 Viet Nam 1 Score compare
- 1 Zambia 1 Score compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 1 Score compare
More economy & growth data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.47 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 190.64 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0058 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 60.71 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 716.58 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -28.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.022 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 228.2 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 2.32 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 1 Score in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 1 Score in 2005.
- What is the lowest there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 Score in 2000.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st out of 173 countries with data for 2023.
- Is there is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence (1=yes; 0=no) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.