Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Latvia
Latvia: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate was -2.42 % change on previous year in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Latvia, 1993–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2004, technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Latvia stood at -2.42 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of down 104.6% on the previous year and down 102.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Latvia peaked at 89.16 % change on previous year in 1994 and was at its lowest, -27.77 % change on previous year, in 2000.
That places Latvia 106th out of 181 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | -18.27 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 89.16 % change on previous year | -587.9% |
| 1995 | 33.88 % change on previous year | -62.0% |
| 1996 | -22.61 % change on previous year | -166.7% |
| 1997 | -15.73 % change on previous year | -30.4% |
| 1998 | -1.76 % change on previous year | -88.8% |
| 1999 | -16.12 % change on previous year | +813.8% |
| 2000 | -27.77 % change on previous year | +72.3% |
| 2001 | -8.13 % change on previous year | -70.7% |
| 2002 | -24.53 % change on previous year | +201.6% |
| 2003 | 52.29 % change on previous year | -313.1% |
| 2004 | -2.42 % change on previous year | -104.6% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's -2.42 % change on previous year is above the median for high income countries, which is -2.67 % change on previous year, 91% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Latvia's -2.42 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4.17 % change on previous year. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.94 % change on previous year | -22.61 % change on previous year | 89.16 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | -2.11 % change on previous year | -27.77 % change on previous year | 52.29 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 103 Rwanda -1.55 % change on previous year compare
- 104 China -2.2 % change on previous year compare
- 105 Burundi -2.23 % change on previous year compare
- 107 Lithuania -2.67 % change on previous year compare
- 108 Dominica -3.25 % change on previous year compare
- 109 Israel -4.62 % change on previous year
More economy & growth data for Latvia
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 317.22 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0065 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 171.67 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 243.70 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -83.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.005 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 131.89 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 18.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1255 includes gold, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita 3,301 includes gold, current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Latvia?
- Technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Latvia was -2.42 % change on previous year in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 89.16 % change on previous year in 1994.
- What is the lowest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -27.77 % change on previous year in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 106th out of 181 countries with data for 2004.
- Is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 102.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Technical cooperation grants DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.