Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Cuba
Cuba: Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate was -0.5724 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
-0.5724 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 96.1%
World rank
98th
of 181 countries
All-time high
850 % change on previous year
in 1961
All-time low
-525 % change on previous year
in 1963
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Cuba, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Cuba is -0.5724 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 96.1% on the previous year and up 94.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Cuba peaked at 850 % change on previous year in 1961 and was at its lowest, -525 % change on previous year, in 1963.
That places Cuba 98th out of 181 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 850 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | -78.95 % change on previous year | -109.3% |
| 1963 | -525 % change on previous year | +565.0% |
| 1964 | 347.06 % change on previous year | -166.1% |
| 1965 | 38.1 % change on previous year | -89.0% |
| 1966 | 25.86 % change on previous year | -32.1% |
| 1967 | 1.37 % change on previous year | -94.7% |
| 1968 | -95.95 % change on previous year | -7104.1% |
| 1970 | 36.64 % change on previous year | -138.2% |
| 1971 | 27.93 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 1972 | 19.65 % change on previous year | -29.7% |
| 1973 | 18.98 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 1974 | 26.99 % change on previous year | +42.2% |
| 1975 | 74.88 % change on previous year | +177.4% |
| 1976 | -7.73 % change on previous year | -110.3% |
| 1977 | 21.26 % change on previous year | -374.8% |
| 1978 | -10.25 % change on previous year | -148.2% |
| 1979 | 15.41 % change on previous year | -250.3% |
| 1980 | 27.53 % change on previous year | +78.7% |
| 1981 | -54.02 % change on previous year | -296.2% |
| 1982 | 28.46 % change on previous year | -152.7% |
| 1983 | 10.13 % change on previous year | -64.4% |
| 1984 | -4.31 % change on previous year | -142.6% |
| 1985 | 12.91 % change on previous year | -399.6% |
| 1986 | 15.56 % change on previous year | +20.5% |
| 1987 | 10.47 % change on previous year | -32.7% |
| 1988 | -12.08 % change on previous year | -215.4% |
| 1989 | 8.41 % change on previous year | -169.6% |
| 1990 | -9.84 % change on previous year | -216.9% |
| 1991 | 53.94 % change on previous year | -648.4% |
| 1992 | 0.5512 % change on previous year | -99.0% |
| 1993 | -3.76 % change on previous year | -782.0% |
| 1994 | -2.36 % change on previous year | -37.2% |
| 1995 | 85.33 % change on previous year | -3716.4% |
| 1996 | -24.82 % change on previous year | -129.1% |
| 1997 | -11 % change on previous year | -55.7% |
| 1998 | 6.59 % change on previous year | -159.8% |
| 1999 | -7.25 % change on previous year | -210.1% |
| 2000 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -131.9% |
| 2001 | 25.25 % change on previous year | +992.4% |
| 2002 | 50.13 % change on previous year | +98.6% |
| 2003 | 84.2 % change on previous year | +68.0% |
| 2004 | -32.27 % change on previous year | -138.3% |
| 2005 | -8.98 % change on previous year | -72.2% |
| 2006 | 16.18 % change on previous year | -280.2% |
| 2007 | -33.4 % change on previous year | -306.4% |
| 2008 | 50.46 % change on previous year | -251.1% |
| 2009 | -0.3207 % change on previous year | -100.6% |
| 2010 | -10.78 % change on previous year | +3260.8% |
| 2011 | -23.83 % change on previous year | +121.1% |
| 2012 | -20.03 % change on previous year | -15.9% |
| 2013 | -9.48 % change on previous year | -52.7% |
| 2014 | -22.65 % change on previous year | +139.0% |
| 2015 | 13.72 % change on previous year | -160.6% |
| 2016 | -16.63 % change on previous year | -221.2% |
| 2017 | 20.05 % change on previous year | -220.6% |
| 2018 | 41.74 % change on previous year | +108.2% |
| 2019 | 0.4537 % change on previous year | -98.9% |
| 2020 | 20.06 % change on previous year | +4322.0% |
| 2021 | -21.87 % change on previous year | -209.0% |
| 2022 | -14.75 % change on previous year | -32.5% |
| 2023 | -0.5724 % change on previous year | -96.1% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -0.5724 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.24 % change on previous year. (59 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -0.5724 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0364 % change on previous year. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1968 | -7104.1% | 1.37 % change on previous year | -95.95 % change on previous year |
| 2020 | +4322.0% | 0.4537 % change on previous year | 20.06 % change on previous year |
| 1995 | +3716.4% | -2.36 % change on previous year | 85.33 % change on previous year |
| 2010 | -3260.8% | -0.3207 % change on previous year | -10.78 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 70.31 % change on previous year | -525 % change on previous year | 850 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 22.38 % change on previous year | -10.25 % change on previous year | 74.88 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.31 % change on previous year | -54.02 % change on previous year | 28.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.74 % change on previous year | -24.82 % change on previous year | 85.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.36 % change on previous year | -33.4 % change on previous year | 84.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.74 % change on previous year | -23.83 % change on previous year | 41.74 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.28 % change on previous year | -21.87 % change on previous year | 20.06 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 95 Nigeria -0.2497 % change on previous year compare
- 96 South Africa -0.3464 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Palestine -0.466 % change on previous year compare
- 99 Mexico -0.7893 % change on previous year compare
- 100 French Polynesia -0.88 % change on previous year compare
- 101 Uganda -1.06 % change on previous year compare
More economy & growth data for Cuba
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) 25.1 % change on previous year (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.3885 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 3,731 current US$ per person (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 21.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per 0.3885 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per 24,524 current LCU per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) -7.43 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 0.2523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 2,335 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) -3.88 % change on previous year (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Cuba?
- Technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate in Cuba was -0.5724 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 850 % change on previous year in 1961.
- What is the lowest technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -525 % change on previous year in 1963.
- How does Cuba rank for technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 98th out of 181 countries with data for 2023.
- Is technical cooperation grants (bop, current us$), annual growth rate rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 94.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Technical cooperation grants DAC2A: Aid (ODA) disbursements to countries and regions, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.