Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre was 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Dominican Republic recorded 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 9.8% on the previous year and up 170.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic peaked at 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1,749 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
Dominican Republic ranks 41st of 195 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,772 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2,269 current LCU per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1963 | 2,467 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1964 | 2,743 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1965 | 1,749 current LCU per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1966 | 2,418 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 1967 | 2,482 current LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 2,852 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1969 | 3,126 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1970 | 3,316 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1971 | 3,736 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1972 | 4,246 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1973 | 4,732 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1974 | 8,230 current LCU per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 1975 | 8,944 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1976 | 7,992 current LCU per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1977 | 9,304 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1978 | 8,342 current LCU per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1979 | 9,431 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1980 | 10,495 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1981 | 11,198 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1982 | 9,791 current LCU per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1983 | 11,882 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1984 | 16,332 current LCU per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1985 | 30,596 current LCU per square kilometre | +87.3% |
| 1986 | 33,476 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1987 | 33,608 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 49,279 current LCU per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 1989 | 63,594 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 1990 | 93,622 current LCU per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1991 | 181,788 current LCU per square kilometre | +94.2% |
| 1992 | 248,930 current LCU per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1993 | 279,538 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1994 | 304,233 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1995 | 363,950 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1996 | 360,758 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1997 | 464,736 current LCU per square kilometre | +28.8% |
| 1998 | 571,778 current LCU per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1999 | 607,112 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2000 | 771,379 current LCU per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 2001 | 823,492 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2002 | 823,395 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2003 | 814,761 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2004 | 1.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 2005 | 1.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 2006 | 1.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2007 | 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 2008 | 2.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2009 | 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2010 | 2.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2011 | 2.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 3.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2013 | 3.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2014 | 3.83 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2015 | 4.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2016 | 5.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2017 | 5.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2018 | 6.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2020 | 6.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2021 | 8.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2022 | 8.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2023 | 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,431 current LCU per square kilometre | 1,749 current LCU per square kilometre | 3,126 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,827 current LCU per square kilometre | 3,316 current LCU per square kilometre | 9,431 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 27,025 current LCU per square kilometre | 9,791 current LCU per square kilometre | 63,594 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 347,645 current LCU per square kilometre | 93,622 current LCU per square kilometre | 607,112 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 771,379 current LCU per square kilometre | 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 38 Togo 9.95 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 39 Senegal 9.78 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 40 Cape Verde 9.67 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 42 Madagascar 9.25 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 43 India 8.97 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 44 Czechia 8.08 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Dominican Republic
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.27 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps -114.00 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.0009 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -9.9 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 4.92 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 9.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0386 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 426.96 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 9.71 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic was 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 9.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,749 current LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Dominican Republic ranks 41st out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 170.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.