Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sweden
Sweden: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 4.3%
World rank
66th
of 186 countries
All-time high
1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2021
All-time low
653,037 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1977
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sweden, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sweden stood at 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 4.3% on the previous year and up 16.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sweden peaked at 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 653,037 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1977.
That places Sweden 66th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 54 years of available data.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sweden, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 704,483 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 660,301 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1972 | 660,414 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 670,212 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1974 | 666,713 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 724,206 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1976 | 690,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1977 | 653,037 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1978 | 720,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1979 | 737,556 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 736,667 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1981 | 710,728 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1982 | 720,830 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 712,407 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1984 | 736,881 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1985 | 762,348 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1986 | 815,938 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1987 | 871,518 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1988 | 886,829 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1989 | 921,419 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1990 | 897,813 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1991 | 879,960 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1992 | 890,485 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1993 | 880,498 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1994 | 900,108 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1995 | 891,219 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1996 | 893,271 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1997 | 908,200 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 945,544 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1999 | 980,085 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 974,923 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2001 | 990,701 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2003 | 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2005 | 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2006 | 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2007 | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2008 | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2010 | 1.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2011 | 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2013 | 1.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2014 | 1.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 1.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2016 | 1.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2017 | 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2019 | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 1.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2022 | 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 604,266 constant LCU per square kilometre, 2.3× the median. (66 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 448,174 constant LCU per square kilometre, 3.1× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 688,789 constant LCU per square kilometre | 653,037 constant LCU per square kilometre | 737,556 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 787,556 constant LCU per square kilometre | 710,728 constant LCU per square kilometre | 921,419 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 906,718 constant LCU per square kilometre | 879,960 constant LCU per square kilometre | 980,085 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 974,923 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
- 63 Haiti 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 64 Gabon 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 65 Kenya 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 67 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 68 Saint Lucia 1.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 69 Grenada 1.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Sweden
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.62 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.12 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 8.03 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.012 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 757.39 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 19.15 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -37.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0286 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,807 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 18.58 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sweden?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sweden was 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 653,037 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1977.
- How does Sweden rank for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Sweden ranks 66th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.