Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Norway
Norway: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
74th
of 186 countries
All-time high
1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
215,845 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Norway, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Norway is 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.
The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 15.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Norway peaked at 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 215,845 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1970.
That places Norway 74th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 54 years of available data.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Norway, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 215,845 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 244,536 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1972 | 261,479 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1973 | 277,642 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1974 | 275,317 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1975 | 288,941 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1976 | 308,312 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1977 | 331,014 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1978 | 324,996 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1979 | 343,151 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1980 | 344,285 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 369,999 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1982 | 371,658 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1983 | 386,939 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1984 | 397,206 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 452,560 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1986 | 499,113 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1987 | 473,889 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1988 | 443,873 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1989 | 425,677 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1990 | 431,772 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1991 | 447,851 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1992 | 462,009 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 484,966 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1994 | 501,098 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 530,862 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1996 | 571,651 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 603,662 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1998 | 632,615 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1999 | 647,887 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2000 | 666,779 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2001 | 691,469 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2002 | 718,027 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2003 | 728,716 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 771,104 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2005 | 801,423 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2006 | 851,524 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2007 | 914,709 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2008 | 903,273 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 899,391 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 927,383 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 958,044 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2012 | 991,091 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2013 | 1.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2015 | 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2016 | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2017 | 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2018 | 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2019 | 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 1.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2021 | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2022 | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 604,266 constant LCU per square kilometre, 1.9× the median. (66 countries reporting)
- Norway's 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 448,174 constant LCU per square kilometre, 2.6× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 287,123 constant LCU per square kilometre | 215,845 constant LCU per square kilometre | 343,151 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 416,520 constant LCU per square kilometre | 344,285 constant LCU per square kilometre | 499,113 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 531,437 constant LCU per square kilometre | 431,772 constant LCU per square kilometre | 647,887 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 794,642 constant LCU per square kilometre | 666,779 constant LCU per square kilometre | 914,709 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 927,383 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 71 Trinidad and Tobago 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 72 Antigua and Barbuda 1.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 73 Uruguay 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 75 Cayman Islands 1.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 76 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 77 United Kingdom 991,357 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Norway
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.7416 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.42 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 1.11 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0021 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 198.35 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled -7.82 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -164.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.0147 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -1,394 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 5.24 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Norway?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Norway was 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 215,845 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Norway rank for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Norway ranks 74th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.