Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Belarus
Belarus: Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.1% on the previous year and up 3.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 41,415 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1994.
That places Belarus 133rd out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 50,108 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 49,724 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 41,415 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1995 | 44,045 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1996 | 49,260 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1997 | 65,011 constant LCU per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1998 | 77,709 constant LCU per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1999 | 67,796 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2000 | 54,449 constant LCU per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2001 | 54,581 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2002 | 59,165 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2003 | 62,522 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2004 | 67,286 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2005 | 72,318 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2006 | 77,172 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 93,158 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2008 | 102,105 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2009 | 100,476 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2010 | 102,086 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 94,785 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2012 | 99,581 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2013 | 104,104 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2014 | 101,480 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2015 | 98,183 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2016 | 97,881 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 100,741 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2018 | 103,619 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 104,449 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 102,718 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2021 | 105,905 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 102,378 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2023 | 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 364,095 constant LCU per square kilometre, 30% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 448,174 constant LCU per square kilometre, 24% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55,634 constant LCU per square kilometre | 41,415 constant LCU per square kilometre | 77,709 constant LCU per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 74,323 constant LCU per square kilometre | 54,449 constant LCU per square kilometre | 102,105 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 100,691 constant LCU per square kilometre | 94,785 constant LCU per square kilometre | 104,449 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 104,645 constant LCU per square kilometre | 102,378 constant LCU per square kilometre | 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 130 Samoa 130,559 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 131 New Zealand 114,375 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 132 Saudi Arabia 110,158 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 134 Finland 97,709 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 135 Fiji 97,542 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 136 Lithuania 94,029 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Belarus
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.52 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.07 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 175.69 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0019 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 19.34 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.60 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -7.77 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0171 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 176.27 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 62.92 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Belarus?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Belarus was 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 107,578 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 41,415 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1994.
- How does Belarus rank for taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Belarus ranks 133rd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.