Tax revenue vs. Electoral Democracy Index in Laos
Laos: Tax revenue vs. Electoral Democracy Index was 0.135 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Tax revenue vs. Electoral Democracy Index in Laos, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index in Laos is 0.135, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index in Laos peaked at 0.313 in 1958 and was at its lowest, 0.022, in 1880.
Laos ranks 160th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tax revenue vs. Electoral Democracy Index in Laos, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.025 | — |
| 1790 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.026 | +4.0% |
| 1831 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.023 | -11.5% |
| 1879 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.022 | -4.3% |
| 1881 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.023 | +4.5% |
| 1885 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.034 | +47.8% |
| 1901 | 0.035 | +2.9% |
| 1902 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.034 | -2.9% |
| 1928 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.035 | +2.9% |
| 1941 | 0.041 | +17.1% |
| 1942 | 0.041 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.04 | -2.4% |
| 1944 | 0.044 | +10.0% |
| 1945 | 0.06 | +36.4% |
| 1946 | 0.104 | +73.3% |
| 1947 | 0.169 | +62.5% |
| 1948 | 0.194 | +14.8% |
| 1949 | 0.194 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.187 | -3.6% |
| 1951 | 0.201 | +7.5% |
| 1952 | 0.203 | +1.0% |
| 1953 | 0.211 | +3.9% |
| 1954 | 0.214 | +1.4% |
| 1955 | 0.231 | +7.9% |
| 1956 | 0.228 | -1.3% |
| 1957 | 0.264 | +15.8% |
| 1958 | 0.313 | +18.6% |
| 1959 | 0.293 | -6.4% |
| 1960 | 0.27 | -7.8% |
| 1961 | 0.215 | -20.4% |
| 1962 | 0.216 | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 0.217 | +0.5% |
| 1964 | 0.219 | +0.9% |
| 1965 | 0.165 | -24.7% |
| 1966 | 0.168 | +1.8% |
| 1967 | 0.238 | +41.7% |
| 1968 | 0.238 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.238 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.238 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.237 | -0.4% |
| 1972 | 0.234 | -1.3% |
| 1973 | 0.235 | +0.4% |
| 1974 | 0.23 | -2.1% |
| 1975 | 0.127 | -44.8% |
| 1976 | 0.069 | -45.7% |
| 1977 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.069 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.07 | +1.4% |
| 1988 | 0.07 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.113 | +61.4% |
| 1990 | 0.116 | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 0.085 | -26.7% |
| 1992 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.086 | +1.2% |
| 1998 | 0.087 | +1.2% |
| 1999 | 0.087 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.087 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.087 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.09 | +3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.089 | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 0.09 | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.092 | +2.2% |
| 2011 | 0.09 | -2.2% |
| 2012 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.091 | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 0.091 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09 | -1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.093 | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 0.124 | +33.3% |
| 2018 | 0.125 | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 0.127 | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.126 | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 0.135 | +7.1% |
| 2022 | 0.134 | -0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.132 | -1.5% |
| 2024 | 0.135 | +2.3% |
| 2025 | 0.135 | +0.0% |
Laos compared with similar countries
- Laos's 0.135 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.3475, 39% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Laos's 0.135 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.4645, 29% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.0254 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.0226 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 3 |
| 1900s | 0.0349 | 0.034 | 0.035 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.035 | 0.035 | 0.035 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.0347 | 0.034 | 0.035 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.034 | 0.034 | 0.034 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.0922 | 0.035 | 0.194 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.2345 | 0.187 | 0.313 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.2184 | 0.165 | 0.27 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.1577 | 0.069 | 0.238 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0736 | 0.069 | 0.113 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0886 | 0.085 | 0.116 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0893 | 0.087 | 0.09 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1013 | 0.09 | 0.127 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1328 | 0.126 | 0.135 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Laos
More economy & growth data for Laos
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.39 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 4.6 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 60.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0083 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 19.21 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 52.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 14.03 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0069 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index in Laos?
- Tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index in Laos was 0.135 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index recorded in Laos?
- The highest recorded value was 0.313 in 1958.
- What is the lowest tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index recorded in Laos?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.022 in 1880.
- How does Laos rank for tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index?
- Laos ranks 160th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is tax revenue vs. electoral democracy index rising or falling in Laos?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Laos data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Tax revenue vs. Electoral Democracy Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 230 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.