Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Nepal
Nepal: Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre was 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.9%
World rank
74th
of 202 countries
All-time high
20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
9,077 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Nepal, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Nepal stood at 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.9% on the previous year and up 212.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Nepal peaked at 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 9,077 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Nepal 74th out of 202 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Nepal, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 27,951 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 30,161 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1963 | 31,832 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1964 | 34,636 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1965 | 9,077 current LCU per square kilometre | -73.8% |
| 1966 | 9,517 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1967 | 10,105 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1968 | 10,546 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1969 | 11,839 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1970 | 12,902 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1971 | 13,874 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1972 | 15,049 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1973 | 16,056 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1974 | 17,811 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1975 | 22,364 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1976 | 25,350 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1977 | 28,287 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1978 | 32,245 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1979 | 34,441 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1980 | 40,266 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1981 | 47,608 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1982 | 53,070 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1983 | 59,524 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1984 | 68,343 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1985 | 102,133 current LCU per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 1986 | 120,441 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1987 | 141,217 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1988 | 166,315 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1989 | 195,552 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1990 | 219,629 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1991 | 290,483 current LCU per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1992 | 352,779 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1993 | 430,741 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1994 | 460,832 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1995 | 508,517 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1996 | 580,846 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1997 | 655,559 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1998 | 741,266 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1999 | 827,210 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2000 | 918,891 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2001 | 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +49.0% |
| 2002 | 1.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 1.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2004 | 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2005 | 1.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2006 | 2.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2007 | 2.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2008 | 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2009 | 3.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2010 | 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2011 | 5.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | +35.0% |
| 2012 | 5.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2013 | 6.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2014 | 7.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2015 | 8.54 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2016 | 9.39 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2017 | 11.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2018 | 12.44 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2019 | 14.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2020 | 14.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2021 | 15.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2022 | 18.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2023 | 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,518 current LCU per square kilometre | 9,077 current LCU per square kilometre | 34,636 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 21,838 current LCU per square kilometre | 12,902 current LCU per square kilometre | 34,441 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 99,447 current LCU per square kilometre | 40,266 current LCU per square kilometre | 195,552 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 506,786 current LCU per square kilometre | 219,629 current LCU per square kilometre | 827,210 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | 918,891 current LCU per square kilometre | 3.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | 14.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 17.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | 14.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
- 71 Cayman Islands 21.91 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 72 Netherlands 21.85 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 73 Burkina Faso 21.20 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 75 Thailand 20.61 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 76 North Macedonia 20.38 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 77 Trinidad and Tobago 19.88 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Nepal
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.28 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.25 Percent per annum (2029)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 3.31 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.1118 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 171.65 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), annual 3.31 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 8.68 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 13,334 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 4.06 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.5437 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Nepal?
- Services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Nepal was 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 20.73 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 9,077 current LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Nepal rank for services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Nepal ranks 74th out of 202 countries with data for 2023.
- Is services, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 212.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Services, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Services, value added (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Services, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Services, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.