Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per in OECD members
OECD members: Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per was 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per in OECD members, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per in OECD members stood at 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 33 years on record.
That represents a change of up 10.9% on the previous year and up 67.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per in OECD members peaked at 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
OECD members ranks 4th of 47 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per in OECD members, year by year
| Year | BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 2,302 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 2,525 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1993 | 2,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1994 | 2,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1995 | 2,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1996 | 3,337 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1997 | 3,291 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1998 | 3,481 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1999 | 5,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +51.9% |
| 2000 | 5,535 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2001 | 6,412 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2002 | 7,136 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2003 | 8,509 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2004 | 9,445 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2005 | 10,764 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2006 | 11,032 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2007 | 12,548 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2008 | 14,074 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2009 | 12,897 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2010 | 13,058 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2011 | 14,389 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2012 | 13,603 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2013 | 14,837 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2014 | 16,137 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2015 | 15,436 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2016 | 15,907 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 17,635 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2018 | 18,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 18,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2020 | 19,614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2021 | 21,372 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2022 | 22,414 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2023 | 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,035 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 2,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 9,835 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,535 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 14,074 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 15,783 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 13,058 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 18,710 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 22,062 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 19,614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 1 Macao 104.06 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Singapore 52.54 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Cayman Islands 26.66 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Bermuda 8.41 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 5.53 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Luxembourg 3.90 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Hong Kong 3.88 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for OECD members
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.1733 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) 4.47 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 7,116 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 0.1456 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.6506 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 2.7 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 8,471 current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 554.27 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 2.6 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0107 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per in OECD members?
- Secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per in OECD members was 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 24,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,172 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does OECD members rank for secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per?
- OECD members ranks 4th out of 47 groups with data for 2023.
- Is secondary income, other sectors, payments (bop, current us$), per rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 67.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Secondary income, other sectors, payments Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.