Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) in Czechia
Czechia: Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) was 86,843 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in 2024. ▲ Rising
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) in Czechia, 1995–2024
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in US dollars per worker, PPP converted.
Analysis
The most recent figure for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) in Czechia is 86,843 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 15.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) in Czechia peaked at 87,728 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in 2022 and was at its lowest, 48,946 US dollars per worker, PPP converted, in 1995.
Czechia ranks 23rd of 41 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 30 years of available data.
Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for) in Czechia, year by year
| Year | US dollars per worker, PPP converted | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 48,946 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | — |
| 1996 | 50,549 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.3% |
| 1997 | 50,240 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -0.6% |
| 1998 | 50,937 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 52,799 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 55,518 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +5.1% |
| 2001 | 57,302 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 58,060 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.3% |
| 2003 | 60,086 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.5% |
| 2004 | 63,071 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +5.0% |
| 2005 | 65,910 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +4.5% |
| 2006 | 69,664 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +5.7% |
| 2007 | 71,786 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 72,710 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.3% |
| 2009 | 70,020 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -3.7% |
| 2010 | 73,096 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +4.4% |
| 2011 | 74,764 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +2.3% |
| 2012 | 73,763 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 73,483 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 75,165 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 77,357 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 78,516 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 81,518 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.8% |
| 2018 | 82,986 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 86,098 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +3.7% |
| 2020 | 83,690 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -2.8% |
| 2021 | 86,122 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +2.9% |
| 2022 | 87,728 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +1.9% |
| 2023 | 86,829 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | -1.0% |
| 2024 | 86,843 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,694 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 48,946 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 52,799 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 5 |
| 2000s | 64,413 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 55,518 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 72,710 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 10 |
| 2010s | 77,674 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 73,096 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 86,098 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 10 |
| 2020s | 86,243 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 83,690 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 87,728 US dollars per worker, PPP converted | 5 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
- 20 Spain 93,652 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
- 21 Cyprus 88,438 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
- 22 Japan 88,414 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
- 24 Poland 81,696 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
- 25 New Zealand 81,292 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
- 26 Slovenia 80,975 US dollars per worker, PPP converted compare
More economy & growth data for Czechia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.31 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), annual growth rate 3.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per unit of GDP 14.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per capita 526,148 current LCU per person (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 3.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.5083 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 18,258 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), annual growth rate 12.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2641 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) in Czechia?
- Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) in Czechia was 86,843 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in 2024, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 87,728 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in 2022.
- What is the lowest real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 48,946 US dollars per worker, PPP converted in 1995.
- How does Czechia rank for real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for)?
- Czechia ranks 23rd out of 41 countries with data for 2024.
- Is real labour productivity by main economic activity (ropi-adjusted for) rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Real labour productivity by main economic activity (ROPI-adjusted for inflation) - Regions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides indicators on labour productivity for large and small regions. Real values are deflation-adjusted using the Regional Producer Price Index (ROPI), where available. Data source and definition Labour productivity is measured as gross value added per employment at place of work by main economic activity. Regional gross value added and employment data are collected from Eurostat (reg_eco10) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. In order to allow comparability over time and across countries, data in current prices are transformed into constant prices and PPP measures. Definition of regions Regions are subnational units below national boundaries. OECD countries have two regional levels: large regions (territorial level 2 or TL2) and small regions (territorial level 3 or TL3). For more information, see the OECD Territorial grid (pdf) and the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx). Use of economic data on small regions When economic analyses are carried out at the TL3 level, it is advisable to aggregate data at the metropolitan region level when several TL3 regions are associated to the same metropolitan region. Metropolitan regions combine TL3 regions when 50% or more of the regional population live in a functionnal urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. This approach corrects the distortions created by commuting. Correspondence between TL3 and metropolitan regions:(xlsx). Small regions (TL3) are categorized based on shared characteristics into regional typologies. See the economic indicators aggregated by territorial typology at country level on the access to City typology (link) and by urban-rural typology (link). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats. Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.