Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) was 41.3 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
41.3 %
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
25th
of 177 countries
All-time high
50.3 %
in 2000
All-time low
41.1 %
in 2020
Years of data
24
2000–2023

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea, 2000–2023

02040602000201120232000: 50.3 %2001: 49.7 %2002: 49.1 %2003: 48.6 %2004: 48 %2005: 47.5 %2006: 46.9 %2007: 46.3 %2008: 45.6 %2009: 44.9 %2010: 44.2 %2011: 43.6 %2012: 43.1 %2013: 42.6 %2014: 42.3 %2015: 42 %2016: 41.7 %2017: 41.5 %2018: 41.4 %2019: 41.2 %2020: 41.1 %2021: 41.1 %2022: 41.1 %2023: 41.3 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea stood at 41.3 %.

The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and down 3.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 50.3 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 41.1 %, in 2020.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th of 177 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National in Equatorial Guinea, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 50.3 %
2001 49.7 % -1.2%
2002 49.1 % -1.2%
2003 48.6 % -1.0%
2004 48 % -1.2%
2005 47.5 % -1.0%
2006 46.9 % -1.3%
2007 46.3 % -1.3%
2008 45.6 % -1.5%
2009 44.9 % -1.5%
2010 44.2 % -1.6%
2011 43.6 % -1.4%
2012 43.1 % -1.1%
2013 42.6 % -1.2%
2014 42.3 % -0.7%
2015 42 % -0.7%
2016 41.7 % -0.7%
2017 41.5 % -0.5%
2018 41.4 % -0.2%
2019 41.2 % -0.5%
2020 41.1 % -0.2%
2021 41.1 % +0.0%
2022 41.1 % +0.0%
2023 41.3 % +0.5%

Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Equatorial Guinea's 41.3 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 22.4 %, 1.8× the median. (52 countries reporting)
  • Equatorial Guinea's 41.3 % is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.95 %, 1.1× the median. (44 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 47.69 % 44.9 % 50.3 % 10
2010s 42.36 % 41.2 % 44.2 % 10
2020s 41.15 % 41.1 % 41.3 % 4

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 22 Senegal 43.1 % compare
  2. 23 Liberia 42.5 % compare
  3. 24 Togo 41.5 % compare
  4. 26 Myanmar 39.7 % compare
  5. 26 Sao Tome and Principe 39.7 % compare
  6. 28 Burundi 39 % compare

See the full ranking of 234 places →

More economy & growth data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea?
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea was 41.3 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 50.3 % in 2000.
What is the lowest prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 41.1 % in 2020.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 25th out of 177 countries with data for 2023.
Is prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/equatorial-guinea/">Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in Equatorial Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.