Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0 units per square kilometre for manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 4.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 0 units per square kilometre in 1974 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 2021.
That places Chile 161st out of 200 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1963 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1964 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1965 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1966 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1967 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1968 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1969 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 0 units per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2011 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2013 | 0 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 0 units per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2020 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2022 | 0 units per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2023 | 0 units per square kilometre | +0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 158 Ukraine 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 159 Namibia 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 160 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 162 Kenya 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 163 Afghanistan 0 units per square kilometre compare
- 164 Zambia 0 units per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), annual growth rate 7.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.9423 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita 16,957 current US$ per person (2025)
- GNI (current US$), annual growth rate 7.7 % change on previous year (2025)
- GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.9459 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GNI (current US$), per capita 17,021 current US$ per person (2025)
- GNI (current LCU), annual growth rate 8.58 % change on previous year (2025)
- GNI (current LCU), per unit of GDP 899.85 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile?
- Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre in Chile was 0 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1974.
- What is the lowest manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2021.
- How does Chile rank for manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 161st out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
- Is manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing value added to gdp divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing value added to gdp ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing value added to gdp Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing value added to gdp divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.