Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre was 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, 1993–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2004, manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan stood at 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.9% on the previous year and up 98.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan peaked at 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 349.07 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Turkmenistan ranks 180th of 200 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 349.07 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 1,500 current US$ per square kilometre | +329.7% |
| 1995 | 2,016 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1996 | 1,225 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 1997 | 1,211 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1998 | 960.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1999 | 894.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2000 | 608.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.0% |
| 2001 | 1,045 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.9% |
| 2002 | 1,377 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.8% |
| 2003 | 2,223 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.5% |
| 2004 | 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,165 current US$ per square kilometre | 349.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,016 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 1,646 current US$ per square kilometre | 608.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Turkmenistan
- 177 Madagascar 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre
- 178 Micronesia, Federated States of 3,235 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 179 Zambia 3,154 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 181 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2,540 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 182 Timor-Leste 2,301 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 183 Afghanistan 1,983 current US$ per square kilometre
More economy & growth data for Turkmenistan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.23 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.25 Percent per annum (2029)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth -86.38 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth -86.37 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 14.46 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 0.6717 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 4,393 current LCU per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 7 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.1176 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 769.24 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan?
- Manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre in Turkmenistan was 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The highest recorded value was 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 349.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Turkmenistan rank for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Turkmenistan ranks 180th out of 200 countries with data for 2004.
- Is manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Turkmenistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 98.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Turkmenistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing, value added (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.