Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico
Mexico: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.4%
World rank
63rd
of 187 countries
All-time high
2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
437,777 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico stood at 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
The figure is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 20.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico peaked at 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 437,777 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Mexico 63rd out of 187 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 437,777 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 470,244 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1967 | 497,923 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1968 | 537,401 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1969 | 575,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1970 | 617,408 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1971 | 635,202 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 689,884 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1973 | 752,447 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1974 | 790,473 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1975 | 823,318 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1976 | 859,770 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1977 | 884,704 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1978 | 971,028 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1979 | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1980 | 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1981 | 1.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1982 | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1983 | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1984 | 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1985 | 1.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1986 | 1.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1987 | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1988 | 1.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1989 | 1.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1990 | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1991 | 1.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1992 | 1.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1993 | 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1994 | 1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 1.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1996 | 1.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1997 | 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1998 | 1.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1999 | 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2000 | 2.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2001 | 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2002 | 1.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2003 | 1.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2004 | 2.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2005 | 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 2.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 2.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2008 | 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2010 | 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2011 | 2.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2012 | 2.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2013 | 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 2.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2015 | 2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2016 | 2.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 2.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2018 | 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2019 | 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2021 | 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2022 | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2023 | 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 503,716 constant LCU per square kilometre | 437,777 constant LCU per square kilometre | 575,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 809,447 constant LCU per square kilometre | 617,408 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 60 Netherlands 2.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 61 Iceland 2.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 62 Bahrain 2.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 64 Cape Verde 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 65 United Arab Emirates 2.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 66 Ireland 2.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Mexico
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.06 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross capital formation (current US$), annual growth rate -5.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross capital formation (current US$), per capita 3,140 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross capital formation (current LCU), annual growth rate -0.4705 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP 4.35 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross capital formation (current LCU), per capita 60,415 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate -6.35 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.1618 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico?
- Manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico was 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 437,777 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Mexico rank for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Mexico ranks 63rd out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.