Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Guatemala
Guatemala: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
90th
of 187 countries
All-time high
770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
86,614 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Guatemala, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Guatemala is 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and up 37.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Guatemala peaked at 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 86,614 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Guatemala 90th out of 187 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 86,614 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 91,328 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 100,273 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1964 | 106,620 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1965 | 115,324 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1966 | 127,352 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1967 | 138,050 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1968 | 154,006 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1969 | 165,188 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1970 | 170,990 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1971 | 183,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1972 | 193,293 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1973 | 209,009 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1974 | 218,558 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1975 | 215,355 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1976 | 237,840 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1977 | 263,286 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1978 | 280,270 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1979 | 295,984 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1980 | 312,667 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1981 | 302,936 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1982 | 287,160 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1983 | 281,721 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1984 | 283,110 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1985 | 280,935 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1986 | 282,808 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1987 | 288,551 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1988 | 294,896 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1989 | 301,667 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1990 | 308,375 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1991 | 315,689 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1992 | 326,025 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1993 | 335,454 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 345,366 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1995 | 356,547 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 363,317 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1997 | 373,169 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 386,709 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1999 | 396,500 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2000 | 403,874 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 408,346 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 413,004 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 423,340 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 444,057 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2005 | 455,620 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2006 | 472,740 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 487,124 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 496,911 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2009 | 492,382 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2010 | 508,864 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 524,291 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 541,465 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 560,168 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 579,324 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 600,575 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 618,418 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 636,917 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2018 | 657,839 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2019 | 679,203 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 674,904 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 730,052 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2022 | 758,534 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2023 | 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 120,528 constant LCU per square kilometre | 86,614 constant LCU per square kilometre | 165,188 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 226,785 constant LCU per square kilometre | 170,990 constant LCU per square kilometre | 295,984 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 291,645 constant LCU per square kilometre | 280,935 constant LCU per square kilometre | 312,667 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 350,715 constant LCU per square kilometre | 308,375 constant LCU per square kilometre | 396,500 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 449,740 constant LCU per square kilometre | 403,874 constant LCU per square kilometre | 496,911 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 590,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | 508,864 constant LCU per square kilometre | 679,203 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 733,542 constant LCU per square kilometre | 674,904 constant LCU per square kilometre | 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 87 Angola 842,368 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 88 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 833,679 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 89 Mali 806,909 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 91 Russian Federation 762,818 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 92 Kazakhstan 684,143 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 93 Norway 676,388 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Guatemala
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.86 Percent per annum (2029)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), annual growth rate 5.61 % change on previous year (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per unit of GDP 1.19 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per capita 7,885 current LCU per person (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 2.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.1157 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 763.73 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), annual growth rate 14.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1671 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Guatemala?
- Manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Guatemala was 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 770,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 86,614 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Guatemala rank for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Guatemala ranks 90th out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.