Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia

Czechia: Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators was -2.5 in 2010. ▲ Rising

Latest (2010)
-2.5
Change on year
up 13.8%
World rank
20th
of 35 countries
All-time high
-2.4
in 2007
All-time low
-5.5
in 2003
Years of data
10
2001–2010

Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia, 2001–2010

-6-5-4-3-22001200520102001: -42002: -52003: -5.52004: -5.42005: -42006: -2.72007: -2.42008: -2.82009: -2.92010: -2.5

Source: Eurostat.

Analysis

Czechia recorded -2.5 for macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators in 2010.

That represents a change of up 13.8% on the previous year and up 37.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators in Czechia peaked at -2.4 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -5.5, in 2003.

That places Czechia 20th out of 35 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.

Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia, year by year

Annual values for Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia, 2001 to 2010.
Year Value Change
2001 -4 —
2002 -5 +25.0%
2003 -5.5 +10.0%
2004 -5.4 -1.8%
2005 -4 -25.9%
2006 -2.7 -32.5%
2007 -2.4 -11.1%
2008 -2.8 +16.7%
2009 -2.9 +3.6%
2010 -2.5 -13.8%

Czechia compared with similar countries

  • Czechia's -2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -2.2, 1.1× the median. (26 countries reporting)
  • Czechia's -2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is -2.3, 1.1× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s -3.86 -5.5 -2.4 9
2010s -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 1

Countries ranked near Czechia

  1. 18 Lithuania -2.3 compare
  2. 18 Lithuania -2.3 compare
  3. 21 Ireland -2.7 compare
  4. 22 Italy -2.8 compare
  5. 23 Slovenia -3 compare
  6. 23 Slovenia -3 compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More economy & growth data for Czechia

All data for Czechia →

Frequently asked questions

What is macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators in Czechia?
Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators in Czechia was -2.5 in 2010, according to Eurostat.
What is the highest macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators recorded in Czechia?
The highest recorded value was -2.4 in 2007.
What is the lowest macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators recorded in Czechia?
The lowest recorded value was -5.5 in 2003.
How does Czechia rank for macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators?
Czechia ranks 20th out of 35 countries with data for 2010.
Is macroeconomic imbalance procedure - statistical annex indicators rising or falling in Czechia?
Over the last ten years it is up 37.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Czechia data come from?
The figures come from Eurostat, published as part of Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/macroeconomic-imbalance-procedure-statistical-annex-indicators/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/macroeconomic-imbalance-procedure-statistical-annex-indicators/czechia/">Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators in Czechia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Macroeconomic imbalance procedure - Statistical annex indicators
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
35 places, 350 data points, 2001–2010
Last refreshed