Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per was 11.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per in Trinidad and Tobago, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per in Trinidad and Tobago stood at 11.37 million current LCU per square kilometre.
The figure is down 33.3% on the previous year and down 29.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 21.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 95,497 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1966.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 95,497 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 106,901 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1968 | 129,064 current LCU per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1969 | 127,076 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1970 | 129,844 current LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1971 | 140,702 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1972 | 166,550 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1973 | 228,674 current LCU per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 1974 | 474,055 current LCU per square kilometre | +107.3% |
| 1975 | 598,947 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 1976 | 692,573 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1977 | 844,074 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1978 | 924,366 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1979 | 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 1980 | 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 1981 | 1.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1982 | 1.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1983 | 1.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1984 | 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1985 | 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1986 | 1.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1987 | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1988 | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1990 | 1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1991 | 1.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1992 | 1.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1993 | 2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1994 | 2.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1995 | 2.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1996 | 3.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1997 | 2.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1998 | 2.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1999 | 3.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2000 | 4.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2001 | 4.85 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 4.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2003 | 7.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 2004 | 8.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 2005 | 11.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 2006 | 13.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2007 | 15.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2008 | 21.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2009 | 12.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | -42.5% |
| 2010 | 14.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 2011 | 18.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2012 | 15.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2013 | 16.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2014 | 16.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 12.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2016 | 10.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2017 | 11.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2018 | 11.91 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2019 | 10.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 8.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2021 | 12.46 million current LCU per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 2022 | 17.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 2023 | 11.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | -33.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 114,635 current LCU per square kilometre | 95,497 current LCU per square kilometre | 129,064 current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 544,078 current LCU per square kilometre | 129,844 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | 21.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | 18.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | 8.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | 17.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 65 Thailand 11.59 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 66 Guyana 11.58 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 67 Burkina Faso 11.48 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 69 San Marino 11.18 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 70 Türkiye 9.92 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 71 Bahrain 9.43 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.79 Percent per annum (2029)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual -4.75 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 0.0525 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 983.34 current LCU per person (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) -5.39 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.0047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 87.84 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) -5.39 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per 0.0265 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per in Trinidad and Tobago was 11.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 21.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 95,497 current LCU per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 68th out of 205 countries with data for 2023.
- Is industry (including construction), value added (current lcu), per rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Industry (including construction), value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.