Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico
Mexico: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per was 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mexico recorded 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.0% on the previous year and up 8.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico peaked at 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 760,400 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
Mexico ranks 74th of 196 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 59 years of available data.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 760,400 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 826,621 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1967 | 887,811 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1968 | 958,451 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1969 | 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1970 | 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1971 | 1.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1972 | 1.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1973 | 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1974 | 1.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1975 | 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1976 | 1.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1977 | 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 1.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1979 | 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1980 | 2.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1981 | 2.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1982 | 2.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1983 | 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1984 | 2.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1985 | 2.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1986 | 2.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1987 | 2.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1988 | 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1989 | 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1990 | 2.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1991 | 2.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1992 | 2.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1993 | 2.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1995 | 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1996 | 2.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1997 | 2.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1998 | 3.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1999 | 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2001 | 3.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2002 | 3.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2003 | 3.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 3.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2005 | 3.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2006 | 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 3.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 3.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2009 | 3.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2010 | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2011 | 3.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 3.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2013 | 3.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 3.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2015 | 3.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 3.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 3.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 3.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 3.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 3.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2021 | 3.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2022 | 3.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2023 | 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 893,073 constant LCU per square kilometre | 760,400 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 71 Haiti 4.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 72 Barbados 4.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 73 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 4.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 75 Djibouti 3.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 76 North Macedonia 3.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 77 Angola 3.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Mexico
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.06 Percent per annum (2029)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) -1.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.2085 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 2,896 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), annual -1.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 4.27 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 59,328 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 0.5468 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.589 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico?
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Mexico was 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 760,400 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Mexico rank for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
- Mexico ranks 74th out of 196 countries with data for 2023.
- Is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Industry (including construction), value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.