Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala
Guatemala: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per was 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala is 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 39.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala peaked at 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 127,256 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Guatemala 108th out of 196 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 129,124 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 127,256 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1963 | 134,163 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 148,288 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1965 | 156,922 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1966 | 172,814 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1967 | 187,560 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1968 | 200,856 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1969 | 214,058 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1970 | 220,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1971 | 233,481 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1972 | 252,171 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1973 | 278,157 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1974 | 285,271 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1975 | 291,152 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 360,861 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1977 | 403,220 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1978 | 428,583 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1979 | 459,603 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1980 | 491,478 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1981 | 498,982 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 466,037 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1983 | 420,252 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1984 | 389,434 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1985 | 379,795 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1986 | 389,444 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1987 | 407,050 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1988 | 428,731 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1989 | 445,338 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1990 | 444,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1991 | 455,650 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1992 | 498,853 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1993 | 509,968 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1994 | 522,470 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 550,550 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1996 | 569,765 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1997 | 606,936 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1998 | 645,009 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1999 | 671,926 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2000 | 654,843 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2001 | 674,359 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 713,318 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2003 | 717,570 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 720,008 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 739,345 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2006 | 787,352 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2007 | 829,810 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2008 | 837,716 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2009 | 813,882 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2010 | 816,158 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2011 | 850,725 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2012 | 862,912 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 891,864 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 956,000 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2015 | 983,828 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 1.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2017 | 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 1.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2019 | 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2020 | 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2022 | 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2023 | 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 163,449 constant LCU per square kilometre | 127,256 constant LCU per square kilometre | 214,058 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 321,317 constant LCU per square kilometre | 220,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | 459,603 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 431,654 constant LCU per square kilometre | 379,795 constant LCU per square kilometre | 498,982 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 547,580 constant LCU per square kilometre | 444,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | 671,926 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 748,820 constant LCU per square kilometre | 654,843 constant LCU per square kilometre | 837,716 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 951,678 constant LCU per square kilometre | 816,158 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 105 Eswatini 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 106 Gambia 1.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 107 Austria 1.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 109 Grenada 1.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 110 Vanuatu 1.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 111 Algeria 1.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Guatemala
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.43 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.86 Percent per annum (2029)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 4.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.1542 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 1,017 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), annual 4.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 1.15 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 7,586 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 9.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6212 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala?
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala was 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 127,256 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Guatemala rank for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
- Guatemala ranks 108th out of 196 countries with data for 2023.
- Is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Industry (including construction), value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.