Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Ecuador
Ecuador: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per was 124,034 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
124,034 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.6%
World rank
164th
of 196 countries
All-time high
126,232 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
11,158 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Ecuador stood at 124,034 constant LCU per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and up 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Ecuador peaked at 126,232 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 11,158 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Ecuador 164th out of 196 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 11,158 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 11,218 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 11,800 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1964 | 13,524 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1965 | 14,950 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1966 | 14,630 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1967 | 15,899 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1968 | 16,076 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1969 | 17,065 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1970 | 18,475 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1971 | 21,572 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1972 | 23,794 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1973 | 30,845 constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1974 | 33,140 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1975 | 36,325 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1976 | 39,327 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1977 | 38,142 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1978 | 41,156 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1979 | 41,571 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1980 | 40,627 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1981 | 40,938 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1982 | 40,828 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1983 | 42,061 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1984 | 43,392 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 45,384 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1986 | 47,121 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1987 | 43,510 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1988 | 49,178 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1989 | 49,000 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1990 | 50,086 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1991 | 51,240 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1992 | 52,252 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1993 | 54,245 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1994 | 58,153 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1995 | 57,952 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1996 | 57,015 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1997 | 58,013 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1998 | 64,962 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1999 | 60,832 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2000 | 71,276 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 2001 | 74,246 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2002 | 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2003 | 78,002 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 86,629 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2005 | 89,913 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2006 | 93,848 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 92,320 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2008 | 96,900 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2009 | 96,352 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2010 | 98,581 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2011 | 107,002 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2012 | 112,192 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2013 | 121,077 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 125,738 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2015 | 122,665 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2016 | 121,532 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2017 | 126,232 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2018 | 121,235 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2019 | 119,453 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 105,724 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2021 | 118,249 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2022 | 124,761 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2023 | 124,034 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,036 constant LCU per square kilometre | 11,158 constant LCU per square kilometre | 17,065 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 32,435 constant LCU per square kilometre | 18,475 constant LCU per square kilometre | 41,571 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 44,204 constant LCU per square kilometre | 40,627 constant LCU per square kilometre | 49,178 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 56,475 constant LCU per square kilometre | 50,086 constant LCU per square kilometre | 64,962 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 85,624 constant LCU per square kilometre | 71,276 constant LCU per square kilometre | 96,900 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 117,571 constant LCU per square kilometre | 98,581 constant LCU per square kilometre | 126,232 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 118,192 constant LCU per square kilometre | 105,724 constant LCU per square kilometre | 124,761 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 161 Botswana 133,080 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 162 Bahamas 132,038 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 163 Estonia 125,003 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 165 Jordan 120,228 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 166 Yemen 109,673 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 167 Brazil 105,963 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Ecuador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 1.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.2056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 1,465 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), annual 1.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 0.2294 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 1,635 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 5.09 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.5697 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Ecuador?
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Ecuador was 124,034 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 126,232 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 11,158 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
- Ecuador ranks 164th out of 196 countries with data for 2023.
- Is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Industry (including construction), value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.