IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre was 2,809 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2,809 units per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
109th
of 189 countries
All-time high
2,809 units per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
54.18 units per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 2,809 units per square kilometre for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 2,809 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 54.18 units per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Ecuador 109th out of 189 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 54.18 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 54.18 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 54.18 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 72.24 units per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1965 | 72.24 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 90.3 units per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1967 | 90.3 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 90.3 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 90.3 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1971 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 119.2 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 252.85 units per square kilometre | +112.1% |
| 1979 | 252.85 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 379.28 units per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1981 | 379.28 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 379.28 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 1984 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 544.36 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1993 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 791.79 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 882.59 units per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2000 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1,217 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1,400 units per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2012 | 1,400 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1,400 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1,400 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1,400 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +100.6% |
| 2017 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2,809 units per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 2,809 units per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4,576 units per square kilometre, 61% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 2,809 units per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 4,221 units per square kilometre, 67% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.25 units per square kilometre | 54.18 units per square kilometre | 90.3 units per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 145.93 units per square kilometre | 119.2 units per square kilometre | 252.85 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 494.83 units per square kilometre | 379.28 units per square kilometre | 544.36 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 793.92 units per square kilometre | 544.36 units per square kilometre | 1,217 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,217 units per square kilometre | 1,217 units per square kilometre | 1,217 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,946 units per square kilometre | 1,217 units per square kilometre | 2,809 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,809 units per square kilometre | 2,809 units per square kilometre | 2,809 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 106 Iceland 3,192 units per square kilometre compare
- 107 Georgia 3,028 units per square kilometre compare
- 108 Sierra Leone 2,873 units per square kilometre compare
- 110 Togo 2,699 units per square kilometre compare
- 111 Nigeria 2,695 units per square kilometre compare
- 112 Liberia 2,683 units per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Ecuador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate -72.83 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 0.2802 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -74.12 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 0.2046 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 12.99 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0828 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 2,809 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 2,809 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 54.18 units per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 109th out of 189 countries with data for 2023.
- Is imf quota, sdr, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of IMF Quota, SDR, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
IMF Quota, SDR ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- IMF Quota, SDR International Monetary Fund
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
IMF Quota, SDR divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.