Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Nepal
Nepal: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square was 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Nepal, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Nepal stood at 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.3% on the previous year and up 49.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Nepal peaked at 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
Nepal ranks 78th of 195 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square in Nepal, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 2.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1967 | 2.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1968 | 2.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1970 | 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1971 | 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1972 | 2.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1973 | 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1974 | 2.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1975 | 2.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 2.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1977 | 2.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 2.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1979 | 2.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1980 | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1981 | 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1982 | 2.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1983 | 2.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1984 | 3.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1985 | 3.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1986 | 3.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1987 | 3.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1988 | 3.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1989 | 4.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1990 | 4.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1991 | 4.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1992 | 4.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1993 | 4.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1994 | 5.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1995 | 5.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1996 | 5.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1997 | 5.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1998 | 6.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1999 | 6.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 6.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2001 | 7.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2002 | 7.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 7.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2004 | 7.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2005 | 7.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2006 | 8.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 8.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 8.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2009 | 9.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2010 | 9.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2011 | 10.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 10.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 10.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2014 | 11.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2015 | 11.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2016 | 11.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 12.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2018 | 13.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2019 | 14.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2020 | 14.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2021 | 15.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2022 | 15.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2023 | 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 2.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 14.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 14.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
- 75 Mongolia 17.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 76 North Macedonia 16.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 77 Kenya 16.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 79 Belgium 15.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 80 Congo 12.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 81 Angola 12.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Nepal
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.28 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.25 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (constant LCU), per capita 46,088 constant LCU per person (2025)
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country), annual growth rate 3.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), annual growth 4.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.8798 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$), per capita 1,351 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), annual growth 6.85 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per unit of GDP 119.9 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU), per capita 184,158 current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Nepal?
- Gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square in Nepal was 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 16.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Nepal rank for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square?
- Nepal ranks 78th out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant lcu), per square rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 49.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.