Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre in Denmark
Denmark: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre was 63.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
63.42 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
54th
of 183 countries
All-time high
64.05 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
58
1966–2023
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre in Denmark, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre in Denmark stood at 63.42 million current LCU per square kilometre.
The figure is down 1.0% on the previous year and up 39.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre in Denmark peaked at 64.05 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre, in 1966.
Denmark ranks 54th of 183 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre in Denmark, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 2.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1968 | 2.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1969 | 2.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1970 | 3.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1971 | 3.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1972 | 4.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1973 | 4.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1974 | 5.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1975 | 5.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1976 | 7.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1977 | 7.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1978 | 8.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1979 | 9.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1980 | 10.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1981 | 10.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1982 | 12.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1983 | 13.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1984 | 14.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1985 | 16.42 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1986 | 17.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1987 | 18.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1988 | 18.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1989 | 19.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1990 | 20.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 20.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1992 | 21.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1993 | 21.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 23.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1995 | 24.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1996 | 25.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1997 | 27.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1998 | 28.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1999 | 29.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2000 | 30.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2001 | 31.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 32.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2003 | 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 35.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2005 | 37.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2006 | 40.47 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2007 | 42.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 43.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 41.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2010 | 42.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2011 | 43.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 44.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2013 | 45.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2014 | 46.31 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 47.46 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2016 | 49.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2017 | 51.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2018 | 53.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2019 | 54.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2020 | 54.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2021 | 59.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2022 | 64.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2023 | 63.42 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 5.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | 9.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 15.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | 19.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 24.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | 20.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | 29.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 37.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | 30.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | 43.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 47.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | 42.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | 54.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 60.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | 54.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | 64.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 51 Argentina 71.23 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 52 Cameroon 65.26 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 53 New Caledonia 64.08 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 55 Angola 54.87 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 56 Malta 53.38 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 51.50 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Denmark
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 0.9574 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.4 Percent per annum (2029)
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita 40,939 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), annual growth rate 8.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.8899 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), per capita 68,494 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate 3.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP 5.89 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per capita 453,557 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 0.6377 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre in Denmark?
- Gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre in Denmark was 63.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 64.05 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in 1966.
- How does Denmark rank for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Denmark ranks 54th out of 183 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross national expenditure (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross national expenditure Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.