Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 41.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka is 41.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 7.3% on the previous year and down 21.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka peaked at 67.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Sri Lanka 27th out of 165 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1964 | 1.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 1.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1966 | 1.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1967 | 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1968 | 1.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1969 | 2.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1970 | 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1971 | 2.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1972 | 2.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1973 | 2.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1974 | 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 1975 | 2.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1976 | 3.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1977 | 3.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1978 | 5.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 1979 | 7.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1980 | 9.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1981 | 8.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1982 | 8.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1983 | 10.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1984 | 10.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 10.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1986 | 11.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1987 | 11.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1988 | 10.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1989 | 9.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1990 | 10.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1991 | 10.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1992 | 11.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1993 | 13.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1994 | 14.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1995 | 14.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1996 | 14.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 15.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1998 | 17.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1999 | 19.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2000 | 20.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2001 | 17.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 2002 | 18.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2003 | 20.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2004 | 24.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2005 | 26.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2006 | 30.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2007 | 32.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2008 | 34.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2009 | 35.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 52.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +50.8% |
| 2016 | 59.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2017 | 67.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2018 | 67.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 60.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2020 | 55.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2021 | 59.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2022 | 44.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2023 | 41.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 8.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 19.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 26.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 17.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 35.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 61.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 52.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 67.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2020s | 50.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 41.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 59.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 24 Armenia 53.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 25 Mauritius 47.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 26 Comoros 47.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 28 Iraq 38.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 29 Cote d'Ivoire 35.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 30 Senegal 31.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Sri Lanka
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP -8.07 Percent per annum (2022)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP -7.82 Percent per annum (2022)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 110.33 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0011 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 5.03 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 761.14 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 6.75 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0076 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 34.73 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 38.34 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka?
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Sri Lanka was 41.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 67.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Sri Lanka ranks 27th out of 165 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross fixed capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.