Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore

Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 178.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
178.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.8%
World rank
11th
of 165 countries
All-time high
179.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore, 1961–2023

050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Singapore stood at 178.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

The figure is down 0.8% on the previous year and up 16.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Singapore peaked at 179.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Singapore 11th out of 165 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore, year by year

Annual values for Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 1.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre +19.3%
1963 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre +23.5%
1964 2.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre +21.3%
1965 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.7%
1966 2.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1967 3.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.1%
1968 4.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre +32.7%
1969 5.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre +29.0%
1970 7.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre +33.2%
1971 9.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre +24.4%
1972 10.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.8%
1973 11.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.8%
1974 12.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre +10.7%
1975 12.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.4%
1976 13.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.2%
1977 13.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.4%
1978 15.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.9%
1979 17.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre +13.4%
1980 20.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre +20.7%
1981 24.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre +16.1%
1982 29.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre +21.0%
1983 32.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.0%
1984 35.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.8%
1985 31.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre -11.7%
1986 27.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre -12.3%
1987 27.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.6%
1988 29.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.7%
1989 33.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre +15.8%
1990 37.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.3%
1991 42.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre +13.3%
1992 47.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.0%
1993 52.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.8%
1994 57.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.9%
1995 64.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.3%
1996 80.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre +24.1%
1997 88.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
1998 84.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre -5.0%
1999 80.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre -4.5%
2000 89.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.4%
2001 85.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre -5.2%
2002 76.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre -9.8%
2003 71.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre -6.8%
2004 78.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre +10.0%
2005 81.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.6%
2006 88.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.6%
2007 102.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre +15.3%
2008 112.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre +10.0%
2009 118.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.5%
2010 125.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.4%
2011 133.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.1%
2012 144.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
2013 153.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.0%
2014 159.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.9%
2015 162.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.0%
2016 163.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.6%
2017 171.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.5%
2018 162.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre -5.1%
2019 165.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
2020 142.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre -13.8%
2021 176.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre +23.5%
2022 179.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.2%
2023 178.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 12.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 29.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 20.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre 35.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 63.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 37.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 88.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 90.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre 71.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 118.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 154.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 125.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 171.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 169.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 142.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre 179.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Singapore

  1. 8 Cambodia 288.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 9 Rwanda 248.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 10 Uganda 182.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 12 Uzbekistan 173.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 13 Costa Rica 170.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 14 Colombia 150.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 165 places →

More economy & growth data for Singapore

All data for Singapore →

Frequently asked questions

What is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Singapore?
Gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Singapore was 178.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Singapore?
The highest recorded value was 179.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
What is the lowest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Singapore?
The lowest recorded value was 1.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Singapore rank for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 11th out of 165 countries with data for 2023.
Is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Singapore?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Singapore data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/">Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Singapore</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.