Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador stood at 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.8% on the previous year and up 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 45,362 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 150th of 175 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 45,362 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 47,813 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 48,758 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1964 | 52,295 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1965 | 53,799 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 54,325 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 56,920 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 58,366 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1969 | 60,557 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1970 | 65,068 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1971 | 68,820 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1972 | 68,880 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1973 | 72,931 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1974 | 88,525 constant LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1975 | 95,143 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1976 | 103,758 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1977 | 109,538 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1978 | 111,510 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1979 | 122,117 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1980 | 128,488 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1981 | 133,697 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1982 | 131,899 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1983 | 130,549 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1984 | 134,694 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 144,128 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1986 | 135,262 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1987 | 135,535 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1988 | 132,447 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1989 | 134,916 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1990 | 146,631 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1991 | 152,384 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1992 | 157,332 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 146,676 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1994 | 151,952 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1995 | 153,915 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 159,404 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1997 | 166,479 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1998 | 186,914 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1999 | 176,226 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2000 | 190,817 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2001 | 198,831 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2002 | 212,908 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2003 | 221,732 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2004 | 234,527 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2005 | 252,338 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2006 | 269,933 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2007 | 281,925 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2008 | 307,586 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2009 | 299,300 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2010 | 316,073 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2011 | 348,833 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2012 | 366,752 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2013 | 394,119 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 411,781 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2015 | 397,596 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2016 | 398,034 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 426,542 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2018 | 432,755 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2019 | 433,604 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 388,967 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2021 | 427,738 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2022 | 450,668 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2023 | 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 9% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 25% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 53,133 constant LCU per square kilometre | 45,362 constant LCU per square kilometre | 60,557 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 90,629 constant LCU per square kilometre | 65,068 constant LCU per square kilometre | 122,117 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 134,162 constant LCU per square kilometre | 128,488 constant LCU per square kilometre | 144,128 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 159,791 constant LCU per square kilometre | 146,631 constant LCU per square kilometre | 186,914 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 246,990 constant LCU per square kilometre | 190,817 constant LCU per square kilometre | 307,586 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 392,609 constant LCU per square kilometre | 316,073 constant LCU per square kilometre | 433,604 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 431,536 constant LCU per square kilometre | 388,967 constant LCU per square kilometre | 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 147 Palau 497,941 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 148 Cuba 470,197 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 149 Peru 467,788 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 151 Kiribati 449,089 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 152 Yemen 435,263 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 153 Solomon Islands 388,228 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Ecuador
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.54 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 0 BoP, current US$ (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 0 BoP, current US$ per person (1989)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 1.30 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 191.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.01 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 71.04 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 41.84 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador was 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 458,770 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 45,362 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 150th out of 175 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic income Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.