Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil stood at 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 3.4% on the previous year and up 4.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 56,615 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Brazil 145th out of 175 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 56,615 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 59,823 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1963 | 60,286 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1964 | 62,557 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1965 | 64,121 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1966 | 68,359 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1967 | 71,120 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1968 | 78,031 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1969 | 85,625 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1970 | 95,279 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1971 | 105,518 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1972 | 118,354 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1973 | 136,322 constant LCU per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1974 | 144,893 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1975 | 152,092 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1976 | 169,210 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1977 | 179,359 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1978 | 186,000 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 197,063 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1980 | 212,443 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1981 | 203,300 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1982 | 205,345 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 198,610 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1984 | 208,850 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 225,639 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1986 | 243,316 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1987 | 251,770 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1988 | 251,214 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1989 | 259,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 248,618 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1991 | 251,080 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 249,240 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1993 | 261,602 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1994 | 277,161 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1995 | 289,356 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1996 | 295,913 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1997 | 305,713 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 306,190 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1999 | 305,335 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 317,413 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2001 | 320,906 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 330,904 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2003 | 333,609 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 353,208 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2005 | 364,000 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2006 | 381,097 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 404,979 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2008 | 427,300 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2009 | 427,090 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2010 | 464,918 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2011 | 487,233 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2012 | 494,313 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 507,808 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 508,014 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 485,156 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2016 | 469,003 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2017 | 477,333 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 485,914 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 490,208 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 474,387 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2021 | 501,580 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2022 | 513,332 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2023 | 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 10% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 29% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 67,393 constant LCU per square kilometre | 56,615 constant LCU per square kilometre | 85,625 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 148,409 constant LCU per square kilometre | 95,279 constant LCU per square kilometre | 197,063 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 226,025 constant LCU per square kilometre | 198,610 constant LCU per square kilometre | 259,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 279,021 constant LCU per square kilometre | 248,618 constant LCU per square kilometre | 306,190 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 366,051 constant LCU per square kilometre | 317,413 constant LCU per square kilometre | 427,300 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 486,990 constant LCU per square kilometre | 464,918 constant LCU per square kilometre | 508,014 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 504,993 constant LCU per square kilometre | 474,387 constant LCU per square kilometre | 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 142 Estonia 701,582 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 143 Bulgaria 653,766 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 144 Tunisia 616,748 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 146 Latvia 501,768 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 147 Palau 497,941 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 148 Cuba 470,197 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Brazil
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.56 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 30.18 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0132 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 141.79 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 77.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 4.84 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0341 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 365 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 8.73 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil was 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 530,672 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 56,615 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Brazil rank for gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 145th out of 175 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic income (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic income (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic income Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic income (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.