GNI (current US$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom
United Kingdom: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre was 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
United Kingdom recorded 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre for gni (current us$), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.7% on the previous year and up 22.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (current us$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom peaked at 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 364,368 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
United Kingdom ranks 21st of 206 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 364,368 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 383,848 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1963 | 407,660 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1964 | 444,757 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1965 | 479,651 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1966 | 509,065 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1967 | 528,310 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1968 | 496,573 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1969 | 535,130 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1970 | 588,191 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1971 | 663,969 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1972 | 761,510 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1973 | 864,295 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1974 | 933,758 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1975 | 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1976 | 1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1977 | 1.19 million current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1978 | 1.51 million current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1979 | 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1980 | 2.49 million current US$ per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1981 | 2.37 million current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1982 | 2.25 million current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1983 | 2.15 million current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1984 | 2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1985 | 2.13 million current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1986 | 2.63 million current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1987 | 3.23 million current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1988 | 3.93 million current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1989 | 3.95 million current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 4.63 million current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1991 | 4.86 million current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 5.07 million current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1993 | 4.56 million current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 4.98 million current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1995 | 5.42 million current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1996 | 5.70 million current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1997 | 6.38 million current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1998 | 6.90 million current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1999 | 6.98 million current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 6.93 million current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2001 | 6.88 million current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2002 | 7.49 million current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2003 | 8.62 million current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2004 | 10.13 million current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2005 | 10.65 million current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2006 | 11.20 million current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2007 | 12.72 million current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2008 | 12.01 million current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2009 | 9.96 million current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2010 | 10.32 million current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2011 | 11.11 million current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 11.14 million current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 11.36 million current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2014 | 12.53 million current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 11.91 million current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2016 | 10.93 million current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2017 | 11.04 million current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 11.81 million current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2019 | 11.87 million current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 11.02 million current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2021 | 13.21 million current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2022 | 13.16 million current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2023 | 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
United Kingdom compared with similar countries
- United Kingdom's 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 3.70 million current US$ per square kilometre, 3.8× the median. (78 countries reporting)
- United Kingdom's 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre, 9.4× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 461,040 current US$ per square kilometre | 364,368 current US$ per square kilometre | 535,130 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.06 million current US$ per square kilometre | 588,191 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.95 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.72 million current US$ per square kilometre | 2.03 million current US$ per square kilometre | 3.95 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.55 million current US$ per square kilometre | 4.56 million current US$ per square kilometre | 6.98 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.66 million current US$ per square kilometre | 6.88 million current US$ per square kilometre | 12.72 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.40 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10.32 million current US$ per square kilometre | 12.53 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.82 million current US$ per square kilometre | 11.02 million current US$ per square kilometre | 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near United Kingdom
- 18 Aruba 19.06 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Qatar 18.01 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Barbados 16.16 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Germany 13.48 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Nauru 12.92 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Isle of Man 12.80 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for United Kingdom
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.14 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.42 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 1.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0099 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 571.28 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -3.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0072 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 417.14 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 3.15 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0051 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (current us$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom?
- Gni (current us$), per square kilometre in United Kingdom was 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in United Kingdom?
- The highest recorded value was 13.90 million current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gni (current us$), per square kilometre recorded in United Kingdom?
- The lowest recorded value was 364,368 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does United Kingdom rank for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
- United Kingdom ranks 21st out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in United Kingdom?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this United Kingdom data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.