GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre was 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.8%
World rank
76th
of 206 countries
All-time high
34.67 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
173,197 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago stood at 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.8% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 34.67 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 173,197 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 76th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 173,197 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 184,815 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1963 | 226,647 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1964 | 237,895 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1965 | 246,140 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1966 | 218,986 current LCU per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 1967 | 234,912 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1968 | 269,220 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1969 | 275,848 current LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1970 | 295,029 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1971 | 319,454 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1972 | 379,240 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1973 | 464,717 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1974 | 703,099 current LCU per square kilometre | +51.3% |
| 1975 | 997,875 current LCU per square kilometre | +41.9% |
| 1976 | 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1977 | 1.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1978 | 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1979 | 2.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1980 | 2.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1981 | 3.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1982 | 3.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1983 | 3.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1984 | 3.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1985 | 3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1986 | 3.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1987 | 3.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1988 | 3.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1989 | 3.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 3.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1991 | 4.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1992 | 4.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1993 | 4.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 5.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1995 | 5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1996 | 6.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1997 | 6.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1998 | 7.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1999 | 7.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2000 | 9.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2001 | 10.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2002 | 10.39 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2003 | 13.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2004 | 15.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2005 | 18.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2006 | 21.43 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2007 | 25.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2008 | 32.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2009 | 22.39 million current LCU per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2010 | 26.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2011 | 28.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2012 | 31.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2013 | 33.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2014 | 34.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 33.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2016 | 30.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 2017 | 31.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2018 | 30.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2019 | 30.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2020 | 26.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2021 | 31.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2022 | 32.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2023 | 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 229,740 current LCU per square kilometre | 173,197 current LCU per square kilometre | 275,848 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 933,720 current LCU per square kilometre | 295,029 current LCU per square kilometre | 2.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | 9.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | 32.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 30.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | 34.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 30.83 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 73 Thailand 34.35 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 74 Aruba 34.12 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 75 North Macedonia 33.99 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 77 Barbados 32.31 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 78 Netherlands 31.24 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 79 Djibouti 30.68 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.79 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 0.429 % change on previous year (2024)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.5918 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Services, value added (current US$), per capita 11,087 current US$ per person (2024)
- Services, value added (current LCU), annual growth rate 0.4266 % change on previous year (2024)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 3.99 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per capita 74,837 current LCU per person (2024)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 0.3688 % change on previous year (2024)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.5468 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago was 33.53 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 34.67 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 173,197 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 76th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.