GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre was 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.9%
World rank
36th
of 206 countries
All-time high
208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
22,672 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 7.9% on the previous year and up 157.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 22,672 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 22,672 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 24,875 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1963 | 27,625 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1964 | 30,058 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1965 | 30,614 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 34,994 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1967 | 36,600 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1968 | 39,400 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1969 | 41,376 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1970 | 22,965 current LCU per square kilometre | -44.5% |
| 1971 | 24,577 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1972 | 27,992 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1973 | 32,854 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1974 | 40,093 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1975 | 47,625 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1976 | 61,096 current LCU per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1977 | 72,261 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1978 | 80,584 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1979 | 90,867 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1980 | 105,447 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1981 | 122,881 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1982 | 145,689 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1983 | 176,500 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1984 | 221,303 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1985 | 300,480 current LCU per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1986 | 396,352 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 1987 | 560,649 current LCU per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1988 | 809,986 current LCU per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 1989 | 1.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1990 | 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 1991 | 1.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1992 | 2.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1993 | 2.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1994 | 3.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1995 | 4.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1996 | 6.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1997 | 7.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1998 | 9.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1999 | 10.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2000 | 11.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2001 | 13.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2002 | 15.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2003 | 17.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2004 | 20.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2005 | 23.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2006 | 26.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2007 | 30.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2008 | 37.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2009 | 42.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2010 | 49.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2011 | 59.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 2012 | 69.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2013 | 81.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2014 | 92.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2015 | 104.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2016 | 119.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2017 | 131.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2018 | 144.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2019 | 155.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2020 | 167.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2021 | 180.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2022 | 193.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2023 | 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,024 current LCU per square kilometre | 22,672 current LCU per square kilometre | 41,376 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 50,092 current LCU per square kilometre | 22,965 current LCU per square kilometre | 90,867 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 384,926 current LCU per square kilometre | 105,447 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 23.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 11.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | 42.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 100.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | 49.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | 155.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 187.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 167.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 33 Equatorial Guinea 248.06 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 34 French Polynesia 215.05 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 35 Myanmar 209.40 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 37 Bermuda 162.71 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 38 Malawi 162.28 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 39 Côte d'Ivoire 148.26 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.67 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 5.85 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.8744 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), per capita 1,117 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- GDP (constant LCU), annual growth rate 5.85 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (constant LCU), per unit of GDP 1,740 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GDP (constant LCU), per capita 2.22 million constant LCU per person (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), annual growth rate 18.11 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3968 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 208.59 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 22,672 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 157.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.