GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Hungary
Hungary: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre was 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.7%
World rank
16th
of 206 countries
All-time high
799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Hungary, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Hungary is 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.7% on the previous year and up 145.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Hungary peaked at 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Hungary 16th out of 206 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Hungary, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1963 | 2.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1964 | 2.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1965 | 2.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1966 | 2.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1967 | 3.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1968 | 3.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1969 | 3.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1970 | 3.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1971 | 4.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1972 | 4.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1973 | 4.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1974 | 5.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1975 | 5.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1976 | 6.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1977 | 6.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1978 | 7.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1979 | 7.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1980 | 8.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1981 | 8.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1982 | 9.43 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1983 | 10.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1984 | 10.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1985 | 11.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1986 | 12.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1987 | 13.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1988 | 16.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1989 | 19.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1990 | 23.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1991 | 28.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1992 | 33.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1993 | 40.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1994 | 49.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1995 | 62.31 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1996 | 75.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1997 | 92.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1998 | 109.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1999 | 121.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2000 | 140.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2001 | 162.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2002 | 183.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2003 | 201.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2004 | 221.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2005 | 236.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2006 | 254.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2007 | 265.46 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2008 | 284.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2009 | 279.85 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2010 | 289.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 300.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 306.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2013 | 325.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2014 | 344.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2015 | 365.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2016 | 387.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2017 | 414.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2018 | 459.44 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2019 | 512.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2020 | 523.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2021 | 590.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2022 | 702.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2023 | 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 5.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | 8.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | 19.16 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 63.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | 23.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | 121.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 222.91 million current LCU per square kilometre | 140.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | 284.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 370.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | 289.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | 512.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 654.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | 523.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 13 Uganda 889.62 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 14 Costa Rica 857.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 15 Iraq 817.87 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 17 Singapore 770.42 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 18 Paraguay 764.68 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Guinea 709.20 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Hungary
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.53 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.2 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), annual growth rate 4.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2663 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita 6,900 current US$ per person (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), annual growth rate 1.12 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP 94.05 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita 2.44 million current LCU per person (2025)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), annual growth rate 14.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.9205 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Hungary?
- Gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Hungary was 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 799.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Hungary rank for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Hungary ranks 16th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is up 145.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.