GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini

Eswatini: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre was 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 11.3%
World rank
135th
of 206 countries
All-time high
4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
1,519 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
48
1961–2023

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini, 1961–2023

01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Eswatini stood at 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 48 years on record.

That represents a change of up 11.3% on the previous year and up 93.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Eswatini peaked at 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1,519 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Eswatini 135th out of 206 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini, year by year

Annual values for GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini, 1961 to 2023.
Year current LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 1,519 current LCU per square kilometre
1962 1,617 current LCU per square kilometre +6.4%
1963 1,910 current LCU per square kilometre +18.2%
1964 2,291 current LCU per square kilometre +19.9%
1965 2,477 current LCU per square kilometre +8.1%
1966 2,820 current LCU per square kilometre +13.9%
1967 2,733 current LCU per square kilometre -3.1%
1968 2,919 current LCU per square kilometre +6.8%
1969 3,814 current LCU per square kilometre +30.7%
1970 4,047 current LCU per square kilometre +6.1%
1971 5,151 current LCU per square kilometre +27.3%
1972 5,884 current LCU per square kilometre +14.2%
1973 7,738 current LCU per square kilometre +31.5%
1974 9,103 current LCU per square kilometre +17.6%
1990 176,556 current LCU per square kilometre +1839.6%
1991 196,805 current LCU per square kilometre +11.5%
1992 226,840 current LCU per square kilometre +15.3%
1993 266,949 current LCU per square kilometre +17.7%
1994 289,591 current LCU per square kilometre +8.5%
1995 375,263 current LCU per square kilometre +29.6%
1996 433,639 current LCU per square kilometre +15.6%
1997 496,916 current LCU per square kilometre +14.6%
1998 525,124 current LCU per square kilometre +5.7%
1999 580,972 current LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
2000 698,570 current LCU per square kilometre +20.2%
2001 803,454 current LCU per square kilometre +15.0%
2002 856,256 current LCU per square kilometre +6.6%
2003 926,977 current LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
2004 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre +9.9%
2005 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre +18.9%
2006 1.27 million current LCU per square kilometre +5.0%
2007 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
2008 1.55 million current LCU per square kilometre +10.4%
2009 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre +9.5%
2010 1.76 million current LCU per square kilometre +3.6%
2011 1.87 million current LCU per square kilometre +6.3%
2012 2.12 million current LCU per square kilometre +13.1%
2013 2.39 million current LCU per square kilometre +13.2%
2014 2.59 million current LCU per square kilometre +8.0%
2015 2.78 million current LCU per square kilometre +7.4%
2016 3.01 million current LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
2017 3.23 million current LCU per square kilometre +7.4%
2018 3.33 million current LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
2019 3.47 million current LCU per square kilometre +4.4%
2020 3.59 million current LCU per square kilometre +3.3%
2021 3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre +6.4%
2022 4.16 million current LCU per square kilometre +8.8%
2023 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre +11.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 2,455 current LCU per square kilometre 1,519 current LCU per square kilometre 3,814 current LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 6,384 current LCU per square kilometre 4,047 current LCU per square kilometre 9,103 current LCU per square kilometre 5
1990s 356,866 current LCU per square kilometre 176,556 current LCU per square kilometre 580,972 current LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 698,570 current LCU per square kilometre 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 2.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 4.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Eswatini

  1. 132 Malaysia 5.38 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 133 France 5.37 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 134 Nicaragua 5.15 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 136 Brunei Darussalam 3.90 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 137 Palestine, State of 3.70 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 138 Ghana 3.70 million current LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 207 places →

More economy & growth data for Eswatini

All data for Eswatini →

Frequently asked questions

What is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Eswatini?
Gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Eswatini was 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Eswatini?
The highest recorded value was 4.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Eswatini?
The lowest recorded value was 1,519 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Eswatini rank for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 135th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
Is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Eswatini?
Over the last ten years it is up 93.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gni-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/">GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Eswatini</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

GNI (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 10,468 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.