GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Cuba
Cuba: GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre was 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Cuba, 1970–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2019, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Cuba stood at 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 50 years on record.
The figure is up 3.3% on the previous year and up 72.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Cuba peaked at 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 51,993 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1970.
Cuba ranks 172nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 51,993 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 63,150 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1972 | 70,803 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1973 | 75,616 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1974 | 85,418 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1975 | 97,560 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1976 | 103,392 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1977 | 107,680 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1978 | 125,487 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1979 | 130,583 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1980 | 130,937 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 152,723 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1982 | 162,624 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1983 | 174,231 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1984 | 193,015 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1985 | 191,594 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1986 | 184,271 current LCU per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1987 | 180,942 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 190,507 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1989 | 193,259 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 196,297 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1991 | 162,794 current LCU per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1992 | 149,936 current LCU per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1993 | 151,657 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 192,076 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1995 | 217,047 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1996 | 228,348 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1997 | 231,680 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1998 | 235,453 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1999 | 259,308 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2000 | 278,804 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2001 | 290,305 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2002 | 309,990 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2003 | 332,149 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2004 | 352,907 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2005 | 394,688 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2006 | 489,757 current LCU per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 2007 | 541,565 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2008 | 561,359 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2009 | 567,803 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 590,906 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2011 | 635,636 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 676,481 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2013 | 731,395 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2014 | 765,258 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2015 | 826,261 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 865,882 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2017 | 920,007 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2018 | 949,663 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 91,168 current LCU per square kilometre | 51,993 current LCU per square kilometre | 130,583 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 175,410 current LCU per square kilometre | 130,937 current LCU per square kilometre | 193,259 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 202,460 current LCU per square kilometre | 149,936 current LCU per square kilometre | 259,308 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 411,933 current LCU per square kilometre | 278,804 current LCU per square kilometre | 567,803 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 794,293 current LCU per square kilometre | 590,906 current LCU per square kilometre | 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 169 Panama 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 170 Belarus 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 171 Samoa 1.01 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 173 Bosnia and Herzegovina 970,279 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 174 American Samoa 948,500 current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 175 Tunisia 938,305 current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Cuba
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), annual growth rate -16.59 % change on previous year (2020)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1053 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita 1,011 current US$ per person (2020)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), annual growth rate -161.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.1053 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita -15,519 current LCU per person (2024)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), annual growth rate 3.2 % change on previous year (2019)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2019)
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per capita 9,010 current US$ per person (2019)
- GNI (current US$), annual growth rate 3.35 % change on previous year (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Cuba?
- Gni (current lcu), per square kilometre in Cuba was 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 981,445 current LCU per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest gni (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 51,993 current LCU per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Cuba rank for gni (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2019.
- Is gni (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 72.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GNI Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.