GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP in Cuba
Cuba: GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP was 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2019. ▼ Falling
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP in Cuba, 1972–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2019, gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp in Cuba stood at 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp in Cuba peaked at 1.19 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0.8135 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1994.
That places Cuba 71st out of 207 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 48 years of available data.
GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 0.9409 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1973 | 0.9558 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1974 | 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 1975 | 1.09 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.4% |
| 1976 | 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1977 | 1.09 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 1978 | 0.973 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1979 | 0.9963 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 1.06 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.5% |
| 1981 | 1.19 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.6% |
| 1982 | 1.11 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1983 | 0.9798 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 1984 | 0.962 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1985 | 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1986 | 1 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1987 | 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 1988 | 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1989 | 1.07 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1990 | 0.9817 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1991 | 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 1992 | 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 0.904 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1994 | 0.8135 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1995 | 0.9125 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.2% |
| 1996 | 1.18 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +29.7% |
| 1997 | 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1998 | 0.9591 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1999 | 0.9368 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2000 | 0.953 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.9711 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 0.9404 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2003 | 0.9682 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2004 | 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 2005 | 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2006 | 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.9849 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2008 | 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2009 | 0.9983 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.9797 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2011 | 0.9163 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.9407 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 0.9718 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 0.9587 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.9401 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 0.9282 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.9303 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.9776 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2019 | 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.9602 current US$ per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.9555 current US$ per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | +29.7% | 0.9125 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1.18 current US$ per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.9409 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1.09 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1980s | 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.962 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1.19 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9835 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.8135 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1.18 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9915 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.9404 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9519 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.9163 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.9797 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 68 Belgium 0.9794 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 69 Togo 0.9791 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 70 Trinidad and Tobago 0.978 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 72 Jamaica 0.9728 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 73 South Sudan 0.9726 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 74 Dominica 0.9726 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More economy & growth data for Cuba
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (1969)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (1969)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp in Cuba?
- Gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp in Cuba was 0.9759 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 1.19 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1981.
- What is the lowest gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.8135 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1994.
- How does Cuba rank for gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 71st out of 207 countries with data for 2019.
- Is gni, atlas method (current us$), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GNI, Atlas method (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GNI, Atlas method (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- GNI, Atlas method Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GNI, Atlas method (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.