Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value in Uganda
Uganda: Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value was 5.69 % in 2016. ◆ Volatile
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value in Uganda, 2001–2016
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Uganda recorded 5.69 % for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value in 2016.
That represents a change of up 1,238.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value in Uganda peaked at 13.71 % in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.5 %, in 2006.
That places Uganda 7th out of 73 countries with data for 2016, putting it in the top 10%.
Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value in Uganda, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 4.74 % | — |
| 2002 | 3.99 % | -15.8% |
| 2006 | -0.5 % | -112.5% |
| 2011 | 13.71 % | -2842.0% |
| 2016 | 5.69 % | -58.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.74 % | -0.5 % | 4.74 % | 3 |
| 2010s | 9.7 % | 5.69 % | 13.71 % | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
More economy & growth data for Uganda
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.29 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.99 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 7.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2293 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita 276.61 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), annual growth rate 27.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2876 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), per capita 346.93 current US$ per person (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU), annual growth rate 24.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per unit of GDP 1,057 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value in Uganda?
- Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value in Uganda was 5.69 % in 2016, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 13.71 % in 2011.
- What is the lowest gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.5 % in 2006.
- How does Uganda rank for gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value?
- Uganda ranks 7th out of 73 countries with data for 2016.
- Is gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — value rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,238.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Gender gap in the completion rate, upper secondary, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.