Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia

Gambia: Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre was 196,104 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
196,104 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.9%
World rank
146th
of 208 countries
All-time high
196,104 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
25,050 units per square kilometre
in 1966
Years of data
58
1966–2023

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia, 1966–2023

50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196619942023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

Gambia recorded 196,104 units per square kilometre for gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 58 years on record.

That represents a change of up 5.9% on the previous year and up 47.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia peaked at 196,104 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 25,050 units per square kilometre, in 1966.

Gambia ranks 146th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia, year by year

Annual values for Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia, 1966 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1966 25,050 units per square kilometre
1967 25,050 units per square kilometre +0.0%
1968 27,449 units per square kilometre +9.6%
1969 28,117 units per square kilometre +2.4%
1970 29,848 units per square kilometre +6.2%
1971 29,828 units per square kilometre -0.1%
1972 29,900 units per square kilometre +0.2%
1973 32,666 units per square kilometre +9.3%
1974 34,586 units per square kilometre +5.9%
1975 38,872 units per square kilometre +12.4%
1976 41,730 units per square kilometre +7.4%
1977 43,166 units per square kilometre +3.4%
1978 45,892 units per square kilometre +6.3%
1979 45,282 units per square kilometre -1.3%
1980 48,122 units per square kilometre +6.3%
1981 49,720 units per square kilometre +3.3%
1982 49,340 units per square kilometre -0.8%
1983 54,710 units per square kilometre +10.9%
1984 56,644 units per square kilometre +3.5%
1985 56,184 units per square kilometre -0.8%
1986 58,482 units per square kilometre +4.1%
1987 59,918 units per square kilometre +2.5%
1988 62,600 units per square kilometre +4.5%
1989 66,291 units per square kilometre +5.9%
1990 68,650 units per square kilometre +3.6%
1991 70,783 units per square kilometre +3.1%
1992 73,175 units per square kilometre +3.4%
1993 75,379 units per square kilometre +3.0%
1994 75,495 units per square kilometre +0.2%
1995 76,161 units per square kilometre +0.9%
1996 77,854 units per square kilometre +2.2%
1997 81,669 units per square kilometre +4.9%
1998 84,528 units per square kilometre +3.5%
1999 89,938 units per square kilometre +6.4%
2000 94,884 units per square kilometre +5.5%
2001 100,387 units per square kilometre +5.8%
2002 97,125 units per square kilometre -3.2%
2003 103,797 units per square kilometre +6.9%
2004 111,115 units per square kilometre +7.1%
2005 108,502 units per square kilometre -2.4%
2006 107,899 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2007 111,183 units per square kilometre +3.0%
2008 118,138 units per square kilometre +6.3%
2009 126,013 units per square kilometre +6.7%
2010 133,458 units per square kilometre +5.9%
2011 122,608 units per square kilometre -8.1%
2012 129,034 units per square kilometre +5.2%
2013 132,741 units per square kilometre +2.9%
2014 130,873 units per square kilometre -1.4%
2015 136,184 units per square kilometre +4.1%
2016 138,830 units per square kilometre +1.9%
2017 145,526 units per square kilometre +4.8%
2018 156,053 units per square kilometre +7.2%
2019 165,764 units per square kilometre +6.2%
2020 166,744 units per square kilometre +0.6%
2021 175,508 units per square kilometre +5.3%
2022 185,148 units per square kilometre +5.5%
2023 196,104 units per square kilometre +5.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 26,416 units per square kilometre 25,050 units per square kilometre 28,117 units per square kilometre 4
1970s 37,177 units per square kilometre 29,828 units per square kilometre 45,892 units per square kilometre 10
1980s 56,201 units per square kilometre 48,122 units per square kilometre 66,291 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 77,363 units per square kilometre 68,650 units per square kilometre 89,938 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 107,904 units per square kilometre 94,884 units per square kilometre 126,013 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 139,107 units per square kilometre 122,608 units per square kilometre 165,764 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 180,876 units per square kilometre 166,744 units per square kilometre 196,104 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Gambia

  1. 143 Australia 214,433 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 144 Canada 207,317 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 145 Cambodia 205,811 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 147 Peru 173,860 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 148 Kenya 172,551 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 149 Benin 158,132 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More economy & growth data for Gambia

All data for Gambia →

Frequently asked questions

What is gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia?
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia was 196,104 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre recorded in Gambia?
The highest recorded value was 196,104 units per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre recorded in Gambia?
The lowest recorded value was 25,050 units per square kilometre in 1966.
How does Gambia rank for gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 146th out of 208 countries with data for 2023.
Is gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre rising or falling in Gambia?
Over the last ten years it is up 47.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Gambia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gdp-worldbank-constant-usd-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/">Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre in Gambia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Gdp worldbank constant usd ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Gdp worldbank constant usd, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 10,650 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gdp worldbank constant usd divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.